A CRITIQUE OF RACE-MIXING
by Andrew Ryan and Peter J. White
"Some races are obviously superior to others.
A more thorough adjustment to the conditions of existence has given
them spirit, vitality, scope and a relative stability…. It is therefore
of the greatest importance not to obscure this superiority by intermarriage
with inferior stock, and thus nullify the progress made by a painful
evolution and a prolonged sifting of souls. mReason protests as much
as instinct against any fusion, for instance, of white and black peoples…
The Jews, the Greeks, the Romans, the English were never so great as
when they confronted other nations… but this greatness falls whenever
contact leads to amalgamation."
-- George Santayana [1]
"One world - one race: the deliberate encouragement
of inter-racial marriage."
-- Rabbi Abraham Feinberg.
"A bastard [Hebrew Mamzer - mongrel] shall
not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation
shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."
-- Deuteronomy 23: 2.
"The most glaring departure which all persons
affected by the idealistic, humanitarian conceptions of brotherhood
make from the instincts of the man in the street, is that of condoning
mixed-marriages, since to these far-sighted intellectuals, racial suicide
is not committed. The America of the future, the believe, belongs to
the new breed of men which will arise from the glorious intermixture
of ethnic odds and ends thrown together from every corner of the earth,
blinding themselves to the evidence that this has been the general course
of events throughout the world, in Latin America, the Mediterranean
and Near East regions, in Southern Asia, and nowhere is the plight of
their precious humanity so desperate as in these same areas. On the
other hand, the peoples which have saved themselves from extreme out-breeding
- the Germanic Caucasian, the Chinese, the Japanese - are similarly
the ones which aspire to greatness."
-- Wayne MacLeod, [2]
"The mixing of very different races modifies
their ancestral influences, but takes away at the same time their mental
stability. A miscegenated people is ungovernable. The anarchy of the
Latin American republic is the proof."
-- Gustave le Bon [3]
ON MISCEGENATION AND THE DESTRUCTION OF RACE
The term "miscegenation" (from the
Latin, miscere, to mix; and genus, for race) was coined by two Irishmen,
George Wakeman and D.G. Croly in their anonymously written 1863 anti-integration
satire, Miscegenation: The Theory of the Blending of the Races, [4]
Today the growth in intermarriage is celebrated by multiculturalists
as a progressive phenomena. The deceptiveness of multiculturalism is
well illustrated by this, for if such a movement was sincerely about
preserving "diversity" it would view the aim of creating the
UN raceless brown colored man with concern. But it does not. Indeed
for today's intellectuals "Mixed Race" has become chic with
its own bizarre academic literature. [5] More orthodox authorities such
as Nathan Glazer in We are All Mulitculturalists Now, [6] trots out
the old line that intermarriage will heal the racial divide and bring
us together. The best refutation of this is given by the Jews. The intermarriage
rate for American Jews has risen to over 50 per cent, but as Professor
Paul Gottfried has said a high rate of Jewish intermarriage has not
produced published evidence of greater Jewish goodwill toward the Christian
"other". [7] There is, correspondingly, no reason to believe
that Black/White intermarriage will heal any racial divide.
All it is likely to do is to produce yet another antagonistic race,
one, judging by the literature on mixed-racialism, facing confusion
about its identity and resentment towards both races. So how does this
solve the problem of racial conflict? It would seem that it merely proliferates
the problem.
Alba points out that the intermarriage rate of Blacks and Whites in
the United States is not as high as it is often thought, (or wished
by the NOW types) to be:
"Virtually all marriages of Whites not of Hispanic background (99
per cent) are with other non-Hispanic Whites according to the census
data. Especially rare are marriages between non-Hispanic Whites and
Blacks, by far the largest group outside of the White population. In
1980, only 0.1 per cent of non-Hispanic Whites had married Blacks. Indeed,
like Whites, Blacks tend to marry within their own racial group: among
Blacks who are not of Hispanic background, only 2 per cent had married
non-Blacks. [8]
This analysis is based on the 1980 US Census, which showed slightly
less than one million interracial couples. The 1990 US Census showed
a slight increase to 1.1 million interracial couples. Adding marriages
between Hispanics and members of other minority groups or non-Hispanic
Whites are included, there were 2.3 million interracial and inter-group
marriages in 1990 compared with 1.6 million in 1980.
Web will consider the Nordic response to this situation below. First,
consider the Jewish communities' response to Jewish/Gentile intermarriage.
Edgar Bronfman (Seagrams - Chair of the AJC) said in 1998 that the Jewish
rate of intermarriage was not 50 per cent, but 70 per cent. Similar
concerns alarm O.J. Simpson's lawyer Alan Dershowitz as expressed in
his book The Vanishing American Jew. [9] The Jewish response by the
faithful has been one of alarm. A full page advertisement on June 21,
1983 in the New York Times, described intermarriage as a "plague"
and an "epidemic". It is condemned as an "ill-conceived,
ill-advised tragic step". We agree, and maintain that this is true
for all interracial marriages. They are not for the good of the races
and racial harmony.
AGAINST MISCEGENATION
The evidence of the race-mixing issue is scattered
and lacking in systematic coherence. The topic has been a sensitive
one for a long time and thus has not been addressed with the methodological
rigor devoted to say the study of racial variations in intelligence.
Thus all claims that race mixing can result in "hybrid (heterosic)
vigor" are totally unsubstantiated for humans. Humans are too heterogenous
(compared to plants and animals) for hybrid vigor to occur. In any case
the offspring hybrids are usually characterized by marked declines in
vigor - so this argument ultimately backfires on the multiculturalist.
From time immemorial animal breeders desiring stamina and vigor have
practiced inbreeding and careful selection. It would, to say the least
be surprising for humans to be different, constituting a biological
discontinuity.
In studies of IQ in mixed races adolescents (White European Americans
X African Americans) indicates that the mixed racial individuals had
a mean IQ between the means of the two parental populations (White IQ>Black
IQ). This is as expected as talented ethnic groups such as the Icelanders,
Chinese, Japanese and the Jews (until recently) have abstained from
interracial matings. [10]
In any case the burden of proof should be upon the race-mixers to show
that miscegenation is biologically beneficial - for it is they who wish
to change the status quo.
Race-mixing may expose offspring to genetic diseases which are ethno-racially
based. A discussion of the genetic diseases of Jews for example, is
given in another paper. For Blacks, sickle-cell anemia is a blood disease
mainly occurring in Blacks. In the UK, about 1 in 200 West Indians and
1 in 100 West Africans have the trait which may be passed on to children.
The survival rate in under 5 year olds is poor. [11] Still, the racial
nihilist can argue that this is a good reason for genetic testing and
screening, so the argument will not be generally successful. It is however,
one link in a chain which can be constructed.
Herbert Spencer [12] and the Harvard geneticist Edward East, a pioneer
in hybrid corn research, thought that genetic crossing would disrupt
the smooth operation of the physical and mental qualities which have
been established in each race over hundreds of generations by natural
selection. The politically correct biologist R. Grant Steen says that
there is no evidence for this view. [13] However there is no evidence
for the contrary multiracial view held by the likes of Steen, and it
is difficult to see how positive proof of their position can be given.
Carleton Coon has said:
"Genes that form part of a cell nucleus possess an internal equilibrium
as a group, just as do the members of social institutions. Genes in
a population are in equilibrium if the population is living a healthy
life as a corporate entity. Racial intermixture can upset the genetic
as well as the social equilibrium of a group, and so, newly introduced
genes tend to disappear or be reduced to a minimum percentage unless
they possess a selective advantage over their local counterparts…
Were it not for the mechanisms cited above, men would not be black,
white, yellow or brown. We would all be a light khaki, for there has
been enough gene flow over the last half million years to have homogenized
us all had that been the evolutionary scheme of things, and had it not
been advantageous to each of the biographical races for it to retain,
for the most part, the adaptive elements in its genetic status quo.
The status quo entails not only the variations in bones and teeth that
are evident in fossil man, but those of the surface features of living
men, like skin, hair, lips and ears, by which we can distinguish races
almost at a glance, but also subtler differences seen only on the dissecting
table or through the eye pieces of microscopes. Races differ in the
extent and manner in which the fine subcutaneous muscles of the lips
and cheeks have become differentiated from the parent mammalian muscle
body; in the chemical composition of hair and of bodily secretions,
including milk; in the ways in which different muscles are attached
to bones; in the sizes and probable rates of different endocrines; in
certain details of the nervous system; as for example, how far down
in the lumber vertebrae the neural canal extends; and in the capacity
of individuals to tolerate crowding and stress." [14]
Glayde Whitney (who accepts that there is some evidence for hybrid vigor
in White X East Asians) also accepts that there are hybrid incompatibilities,
genetic mixes that do not work well. [15] "Disharmonious combinations"
can be found between Blacks and Whites in a wide range of phenomena
ranging from genetic disease transmission to possible birth delivery
difficulties (especially a problem for Asian crosses with either Blacks
or Whites - body and head size does matter). [16]
Others have viewed controlled inbreeding (the opposite of miscegenation)
as having a positive eugenic effect. Outbreeding tends to hide and spread
recessive defects (e.g., many genetic diseases); in this sense inbreeding
can have a "cleansing" effect on the gene pool. In the most
extreme cases fruit flies have been inbred brother to sister for 75
generations and rats for 25 generations with no loss of fertility or
vigor. Anthony Ludovici presents in The Choice of a Mate, [17] an interesting
defense of incest and inbreeding, backing his theoretical arguments
up with historical examples of societies where at least among the ruling
class, incest was practiced with no ill effects (e.g., Ancient Egypt).
Indeed, as far as the qualities needed for leadership, it seems to have
produced human thoroughbreds. Inbreeding is only a disaster if the genes
causing "disaster" are present in the stock - and eugenics
is thus necessary for racial purification. In modern times people in
the Norfolk Islands married cousins so that everyone on the island was
related - with no less fertility or vigor.
We do not of course support the practice of incest but only cite an
extreme example in refutation of the miscegenist.
Alan McGregor has given a theoretical argument for the evolutionary
function of prejudice, which also runs counter to the cult of the "mongrel"
popularized by multiracialism. [18]
"Prejudice is viewed from a sociobiological perspective with the
emotional tensions generated when diverse groups come into contact not
merely due to different cultural systems but to sociobiological mechanisms
serving an evolutionary function. The basic pattern of human behavior
and human emotions had been determined by evolutionary forces long before
people of diverse groups were forced to live together in multicultural/racial
societies. In-group/out-group racial relationships contributed to an
ethnic consciousness and a sense of racial distance that has tended
to keep racially diverse populations genetically separate through hundreds
of thousands of years of evolutionary development. Evolution is the
process by which new forms of life arise on earth to replace less fit
to survive in a state of competition.
There are two trends - one of increasing morphological complexity of
organisms over time e.g., from unicellular life forms to mammals. The
second is a trend from primitive uniformity of life forms to rich diversity
of diverse species, sub-species or races. Both trends depend upon the
genetic isolation of discrete populations.
If hybridization of evolutionary sub-species occur then the sub-species
consequently loses "its novel and distinctive combination of genes
by admixture with sibling populations, or by reabsorption of divergent
sibling populations into the parental stock." [19]
The Jewish biologist T. Dobzkansky, in Genetics
and the Origin of Species, has noted:
"If [the] differentiation is allowed to proceed unimpeded, most
or all of the individuals of one race may come to possess certain genes
which those of the other race do not. Finally, mechanisms preventing
interbreeding of races may develop, splitting what used to be a single
collective genotype into two or more separate ones. When such mechanisms
have developed and the prevention of interbreeding is more or less complete,
we are dealing with separate species. A race becomes more and more of
a "concrete entity" as this process goes on; what is essential
about races is not their state of being but that of becoming. But when
the separation of races is complete, we are dealing with races no longer,
for what have emerged are separate species. … Races and species
as discrete arrays of individuals may exist only so long as the genetic
structures of their populations are preserved distinct by some mechanisms
which prevent their interbreeding. Unlimited interbreeding of two or
more initially different populations unavoidably results in an exchange
of genes between them and a consequent fusing of the once distinct groups
into a single greatly variable array. A number of mechanisms encountered
in nature [ecological isolation, sexual isolation, hybrid sterility,
and others] guard against such a fusion of the discrete arrays and the
consequent decay of discontinuous variability. The origin and functioning
of the isolating mechanisms constitute one of the most important problems
of the genetics of populations". [20]
Higher mobile animals living under natural conditions
evolve a sense of territoriality which results in them becoming isolated
or semi-isolated geographically in what is called demes. As well, "feral
restraints" are developed, an unwillingness to interbreed with
members of other sub-species, thus preventing hybridization.
The feral restraints are of two types. The first are "built in"
constraints based upon physical sign stimuli such as distinctive shapes,
colors, smells or patterns of movement common to animals of the same
sub-species but not present in animals of different sub-species. These
signs serve as a warning not to attempt sexual relationships. Secondly,
acquired constraints exist among feral animals due to behavioral imprinting.
These constraints can be broken down by domestication often resulting
in behavior which is evolutionary deranged - such as mating with animals
of other breeds. This if extensively practised, would lead to the end
of racial diversification McGregor comments:
"Culture, particularly in urbanized societies may likewise pervert
human instincts by suppressing natural feral constraints and encouraging
abnormal patterns of behavior, leading to similar distortions of normal
biological behavior, such as homosexuality and the quest for abnormal
erotic experiences, including those associated with interracial sexual
experimentation". [21]
Evolution is not concerned with individual organisms
but with phylogenetic continuum:
Individuals are merely links in the chain of the generations of breeding
populations. McGregor notes that evolutionary competition is between
rival sub-species. Darwin's The Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection, is also subtitled Or the Preservation of favored Races in
the Struggle for Life.
Evolutionary struggle is most intense between sub-species or races,
dependant on, and competing for, similar resources so that one species
outbreeds and crowds out the other. McGregor says:
"The genetic advancement of man arose as a result of on-going competition
for survival between genetically different, non-interbreeding hominid
populations, and was sustained not merely by geographical isolation
but also by developing bonds of co-operation and love within the kindred,
and of suspicion, fear, antagonism, and even warfare against such alien
groups as might become competitors for the territorial and material
resources necessary to sustain life". [22]
Ethnocentrism also has an evolutionary basis
McGregor argues:
"In their earlier more feral existence at the level of the primate
troop, the human band, and the human tribe, man's forebears consequently
developed a capacity to distrust and repel those they perceived of as
alien, as well as to love and to assist those whom they identified as
allies. Every member of every human group has ever since experienced
two different sets of reactions when dealing with others: one of loyalty
towards members of the in-group, the other of caution and competitiveness
towards members of the out-group. Ludwig Gumplowitz referred to these
two separate sets of behavior as syngenism (attachment and loyalty)
and ethnocentrism (suspicion of aliens). He further suggested that the
pressure of competition from other groups tended to reinforce the feelings
of loyalty and co-operation, heightening the consciousness of ethnocentrism
and prejudice against "outsiders". These forces enhance the
competitive viability of the group in its struggle to survive and to
outbreed rival groups, and also serve to protect the ongoing process
of homogenization within the group's own gene pool - a process which
is itself dependant upon a high degree of genetic isolation". [23]
The avoidance of race-mixing is a natural phenomenon, overcome only
by extensive cultural brain-washing:
"These attitudes if in-group loyalty and out-group suspicion which
appear to have evolved long before the evolution of primitive human
bands and to have developed more consciously identifiable form at the
level of tribal and national societies, reflect a clear-cut evolutionary
purpose. Patterns of racial and ethnic prejudice, of in-group loyalty
and out-group suspicion, have served an effective evolutionary purpose
over the long history of primate and human biological evolution, both
in enhancing the competitiveness of the individual breeding population
and also in preserving the uniqueness of its distinctive genetic heritage
by discouraging interbreeding with the members of disparate sub-species.
The evolutionary message is clear. Human groups which lose their internal
sense of identity and cohesion in respect to other groups eventually
cease to exist as discrete realities. Amongst the higher more mobile
forms of animal life, isolating mechanisms such as prejudice are necessary
to preserve the genetic identity of races and sub-species (as emergent
species) by inhibiting miscegenation and preventing what S. Wright (1956)
has referred to as "the formatting unharmonious constellations
of genes". A human population which practices endogamous marriage
and strives to preserve the integrity of its gene pool should not be
criticized as immoral. Such behavior implies that it is adhering to
deeply rooted instincts essential to the evolutionary process, which
process - from the point of view of purely logical, naturalistic thought
- provides the only basis for any scientifically sound system of ethical
philosophy". [24]
McGregor's position seems to be supported by
mathematical models which indicate that evolutionary change may occur
other than by mutation of the gene pool, but rather by species under
environmental stress rearranging their existing genes already in the
population through selective interbreeding, to produce new sub-types.
Miscegenation ten is an anti-eugenic force. [25]
MISCEGENATION AND THE FALL OF EMPIRES
"The danger is from within and not from
without. Neither the black nor the brown, nor the yellow, nor the red
will conquer the white in battle. But if the valuable elements in the
Nordic race mix with inferior strains or die out through race suicide,
then the citadel of civilization will fall for mere lack of defenders".
- Madison Grant. [26]
"The mobs of great cities add, just so much
to the support of pure government, as sores do to the strength of the
human body. It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve
a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats
to the heart of its laws and constitution".
- Thomas Jefferson.
"You can level human beings down. You cannot
level them up."
S.J. Holmes. [27]
It is the view of the Jewish writer Robert D.
Kaplan, best known for his writings on the "coming anarchy"
and the breakdown of nations, that America's multiracialism is not a
threat to its existence. He claims that intermarriage in LA is not creating
a divided city; this is different from the LA which we know. [28] He
recognizes that traditionally, nations fall, but hopes that America
will not, becoming an "international civilization".[29] Similar
views are held by Michael Lind.[30] However there is an opposing racialist
view to this that sees multiculturalism/multiracialism as spelling the
end of civilization, a prelude to its fall.[31]
Lothrop Stoddard observed that human history "is littered with
the wrecks of dead civilizations and dotted with the graves of promising
peoples stricken by an untimely end".[32] Civilization imposes
a burden, it is a product of human creative energy, which in turn "springs
from the creative urge of superior germplasm". Civilization is
thus fundamentally conditioned by the limits of the creative capacities
of the race.
Civilizations depend upon quality, the elites
in society and this in turn depends upon inheritance:
"Environment may bring out all there is in a man but heredity predetermines
what there is to bring". [34] Thus civilizations need not decay
if an adequate supply of superior individuals can be produced.
This has not occurred for 3 reasons:
· The tendency to structural overloading
· The tendency to biological regression
· The tendency to atavistic revolt
Structural overloading means "the social
environment has outrun inherited capacity". [35]
This means:
"The grim frequency of such declines throughout history seems to
show that in every highly developed society the increasingly massive,
complex superstructure of civilization tends to overload the human foundations."[36]
Complexity of society increases faster than the capacity for individuals
to bear as brain capacity has not increased since early man. Structural
overloading arises from this increasing complexity and from the influence
of other civilizations.
Biological Regression - civilization tends to
impair strong stocks "to unmake those very racial values which
first enabled a people to undertake its civilizing task." [37]
The problem for the Western White Man is that "barbarian stocks"
such as the Negro threaten the race with 'pacific penetration"
due to their fast breeding. Their existence "upset living standards,
socially sterilizes the higher native stocks, and if (as usually happens
in the long run) interbreeding occurs, the racial foundations of civilization
are undermined, and the mongrelized population, unable to bear the burden,
sinks to a lower plane". [38]
Civilization modified the natural process of selection for survival
resulting in a change from a "natural" to an artificial environment
and the modification of natural selection by social selection. This
enabled "weak, stupid and degenerative persons" to live and
beget. The strong also lived but tended to have fewer children as the
trappings of civilization - power, leisure, art and wealth - "tended
to divert human energy from racial ends to individual and social ends".
[39] Thus:
"Absorbed in personal and social matters, racial matters were neglected.
Late marriage, fewer children, and celibacy combined to thin the ranks
of the successful, diminish the number of superior strains, and thus
gradually impoverish the race". [40]
Numbers of the inferior meanwhile increased, surviving and multiplying
protected from natural selection by civilization. Biological regression
occurred: "Drained of its superiors, and saturated with dullards
and degenerates, the stock could no longer support its civilization.
And, the upper layers of the human foundation having withered away,
the civilization either sank to a lower level or collapsed in utter
ruin. The stock had regressed, "gone back", and the civilization
went back too". [41]
Atavistic Revolt occurs due to the role of "inferiors"
or the under-man "the man who measures under the standards of capacity
and adaptability imposed by the social order in which he lives".[42]
The social order oppresses the Under-Man and he in turn exhibits "instinctive
opposition and dissent" - indeed, often "flaming hatred and
rebellion". This is a revolt against civilization itself which
is not reformed by diminishing social discontent, for within the breast
of the Under-Man remains "a vast residue of unadaptable, depreciated
humanity, essentially uncivilizable and incorrigibly hostile to civilization".[43]
Continuing he says: "Every society engenders within itself hordes
of savages and barbarians, ripe for revolt and ever ready to pour forth
and destroy". [44] Normally they can be kept under control by prison
and the rope, but when the decay of the human foundations of a civilization
occurs, they cannot.
Leaders of the atavistic revolt are:
The "border-liner" - fail in the stabilized order because
of some fatal character or mental defect, but may possess brilliants
talents to be used against society.
The "disinherited" - is capable of success but are "disinherited"
by social injustice or individual wrong-doing.
"Misguided Superior" - a superior who goes over to the other
side. He revolts because civilization is so far behind:
"Exasperated by its slow progress, shocked by its faults, and erroneously
ascribing to mankind in general his own lofty impulses, the misguided
superior dreams short cuts to the millennium and joins the forces of
social revolt, not realizing that their ends are profoundly different
even though their methods may be somewhat the same. The misguided superior
is probably the most pathetic figure in human history. Flattered by
designing scoundrels, used to sanctify sinister schemes, and pushed
forward as a figurehead during the early stages of revolutionary agitation,
the triumph of the revolution brings him to a tragic end. Horrified
at sight of barbarism's unmasked face, he tries to stay its destructive
course. In vain! The Under-man turns upon his former champion with a
snarl and tramples him into the mud". [45]
In social revolution, when social controls vanish, the Under-Man within
all, rises to the surface and the reign of barbarisms dawns. This was
well illustrated by the Soviet Union "experiment".
What historical evidence exists to support this
position? Blonds are frequently referred to in Greco-Roman literary
texts and visual arts.
Historic Greek personages designated as blonds are: Alexander, Alcibiades,
Anacreon, Dionysus I of Syracuse, Critias, Lysimachus and Pyrrhus.
Romans: Cato the Elder, Sulla, Pompey, Mark Antony, Augustus, Caligula,
Nero, Vitellius, Titus, Domitian, Trajan, Commodus, Caracalla, Gordianus
1, 11, 11, Gallienus and his Salonius, Theodosius I and II, and Honorius.
Many patrician family names designated blond or red hair: Flaviani,
Fulvii, Rufini and Rutili. These are Nordic people, with a Mediterranean
mix.
A. Jacob has suggested that the cases of ancient
Greece and Rome confirm the racial theory of civilization decline. He
has said:
"…people decline when they impose needless limitations upon
themselves. Man, above all White Christian man, is a spirit, not a hopeless
lump of liberal dough. The White race has always been hopelessly outnumbered,
but it has never been conquered. On the contrary, it has conquered the
world. Nor is there anything inevitable about the decline and disappearance
of empires and nations. It is true that the ancient Greeks and Romans
our preceptors in culture and civilization respectively, disappeared
from the world. But that is precisely the point: they simply ceased
to exist at all. They disappeared through assimilation with other people.
To be sure, the ancient Greeks paved the way for their disappearance
through their unrelenting fratricidal strife, exactly as we have been
doing in the last two world wars; while Rome itself was simply inundated
by multiracial torrents springing from all parts of the empire and beyond;
resulting eventually in a corrupt multiracial Senate; in the gradual
amendment and ultimate abolishment of the laws and constitution of the
Res Publica; in the official declaration of universal human equality
(which in depriving the roman citizen of his privileges also deprived
him of his sense of duty and responsibility) and finally in complete
racial amalgamation. Rome, having been declared to exist everywhere,
ceased to exist anywhere.
Nevertheless it was not inevitable, except after
the process of racial assimilation had become too far advanced. Provided
a nation retains its energy-material. Which is its people, intact and
unimpaired (save perhaps for a limited and judicious infusion, at prolonged
intervals, of good, related blood), it will always be capable of greatness.
But those that are, though they may alternatively expand and contract,
much like the breathing universe itself, need never resign themselves
to oblivion provided they cleave to their distinctive identities".
[46]
The destruction of ancient Greece by race-mixing
has been recognized since the writings of Lycurgus who said: "Athens
fell from want of Athenians." L.A. Waddell argued for this thesis
in detail in his The Makers of Civilization in Race and History:
"Civilization is fundamentally conditioned by superior quality
of race, and that in the classical Greek period civilization reached
its zenith under the Aryan or Nordic race… and that it waned and
became practically extinct in later Greece with the weakening and practical
extinction there of that racial element".[47] Likewise for ancient
Rome. Tenney Frank said that an orientalizing of Rome's populace had
occurred. Rome was engulfed by alien races by the beginning of the 3rd
century AD. Cardacalla (211-217 AD reign) conferred Roman citizenship
on all inhabitants of the Empire. The alien children were born in such
numbers and soon had such a high proportion of the vote that the government
and its policies changed. Frank says:
"There is today a healthy activity in the study of the economic
factors - unscientific finance, fiscal agriculture, inadequate support
of industry and commerce, etc - that contributed to Rome's decline.
But what lay behind and constantly reacted upon such causes of Rome's
disintegration was after all, to a considerable extent, the fact that
the people who built Rome had given way to a different race. The lack
of energy and enterprise, the failure of foresight and common sense,
the weakening of moral and political stamina, all were concomitant with
the gradual diminution of the stock, which, during the earlier days,
had displayed these qualities". [48]
Thus when Rome fell in 476AD it had 500,000
soldiers. It was destroyed by two German tribes with a total of 40,000
men.
The Negroes' contribution to Portugal from 1441, was primarily genetic.
The first Black slaves were brought to Lisbon in 1441, and continued
to be imported until 1550 when the Negro population of Portugal was
10 per cent. There was no taboo or injunction against miscegenation
so that the Negroes were completely absorbed into Portugal's gene pool.
By the middle of the 16th century Portugal was the wealthiest, most
powerful country in the world with a large empire and colonies. The
Portuguese people were highly civilized, imaginative and intelligent.
But the Portuguese of the "age of discoveries' and the Portuguese
of the 17th and later centuries were two different races. This decline
corresponds perfectly with the genetic input which Portugal received
from its Negro slaves. No other answer put forward using economic variables
explains the "crash of culture" that occurred. No other country
in Europe that dealt in slaves took them into their nation for the purposes
of integration.
NORDICIDE
Although the figures for interracial marriage may seem prima-facie "good
news" for White racialists, this ignores the particular danger
which such statistics have for defenders of the Nordic (Northern European)
type. The statistic ignores the marriage of Nordics with other "Whites"
such as Southern Italians, Oriental Greeks and Arabs. Such mating obliterates
the fine-grained recessive gene qualities of Nordics (fair hair, blue
eyes, light skin, etc.) as surely as mating with a Black or Asian. Thus,
the pinnacles of Nordic beauty - White or ultra-blond hair - has now
virtually disappeared from Western populations, to be seen mainly in
young Nordic children before their hair darkens. The few women, and
men, with such hair, are explicitly targeted for passive genocide by
out-breeding, with those that are dark. Red hair seems to be the next
Nordic quality for genetic elimination. In particular it is a matter
of common knowledge that colored males looking for a trophy wife typically
choose the blue-eyed blond-haired all American girl. Here is Benjamin
Ginsberg [49] quoting from C. Bruck's The Predator's Ball, [50] about
the 1985 Drexel Burham High Yield Bond Conference where the Jewish financiers
gets the blond American girl:
"The sorts of beautiful women that the financiers must have dreamed
about in high school but were unable to attract. No explanation is given
for this youthful failure but the reader can easily surmise that the
Jewish financiers could only attract the blond Gentile women of their
dreams when their bank accounts had grown large enough to overcome their
more undesirable Jewish characteristics. Students of popular culture
might also note that the behavior and instincts attributed to these
blond gentile women have changed markedly over the past century. Whereas
in nineteenth-century works describing Jewish avarice the blond heroine
was usually repulsed by her Jewish suitor despite his wealth - remember
the lovely Estelle Washington - her late twentieth-century sister seems
to be more readily available." [51]
All of which shows how deeply the culture of
greed has penetrated into our collective unconsciousness. Yet for the
ancient Nordics, racial purity was regarded as sacred. A Nordic woman
bearing the child of a foreigner faced punishment by death, for women
were the repositories of the racial spirit or soul and miscegenation
meant racial death.
Roman historians such as Tacitus observed that
the Germanic women would sooner perish than be taken captive by Roman
or foreign soldiers. Tacitus in Germania said "I accept the view
that the peoples of Germania have never been tainted by intermarriage
with other peoples, and stand out as a nation, peculiar, pure and unique
of its kind".[52] Thus our ancient forebears rightfully looked
upon race-mixing as the most serious of crimes, being a crime not only
against the individual but of the race as a whole. As Jacobs notes:
We happen to know that the ancient Nordics regarded their racial purity
as something sacred. It was a crime punishable with death for a Nordic
woman to bear the child of a foreigner. Women, to the Nordics, were
the source of life and the repositories of the racial 'spirit'. If a
woman were to suffer pollution from foreign seed the entire tribe's
harmonious relationship with its natural-cum-supernatural environment
would be disturbed and seriously endangered. The secret springs of the
tribe, having been polluted, would wither and die. In short, foreign
admixture meant death to the race." [53] More recently Sarich and
Miele, although multiracialists themselves, have given a concise summary
of the racialist solidarist perspective, intermarriage is an act of
race war. Every ovum that is impregnated by the sperm of a member of
a different race is one less of that precious commodity to be impregnated
by a member of its own race and thereby ensure its survival". With
contempt for his/her race the miscegenating individual seeks to end
his/her racial family line. This is worse than murder: it is genocide.
[55] It is time to return to the racial philosophy of the ancient Germans.
[56]
NOTES
1. G. Santayana, The Life of Reason, (Scriber's, New York, 1922), vol.2,
pp.166-167.
2. W. McLeod, The Importance of Race in Civilization, (Noontide Press,
Los Angeles, 1968), pp.17-18.
3. Mr. A. Widener, editor and translator, Gustave Le Bon: The Man and
His Works, (Liberty Press, Indianapolis, 1979), p.196.
4. Jim Goad, The Redneck Manifesto, (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1997),
p.43.
5. M.C. Waters, Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America, (University
of California Press, Berkeley, 1990); K.G. Azoulay, Black, Jew and Interracial,
(Duke Universsity Press, Durham, 1997); N. Zack (ed.), American Mixed
Race: The Culture of Microdiversity, (Rowman and Littefield, Lanham,
1995); D.R.Roediger, Towards the Abolition of Whiteness, (Verso, London,
1994); F. Chideya, The Color of Our Future, (William Morrow and Company,
New York, 1999).
6. N. Glazer, We Are All Multiculturalists Now, (Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, 1997). Also: J. Smolowe, "Intermarried…
With Children," Time, Fall 1993, pp.64-65; M.A. Fletcher, "Mixed
Marriages Give US melting Pot New Life," International Herald Tribune,
December 30 1998, p.2; S. Kalish, "Multiracial Births Increase
as US Ponders Racial Definitions," Population Today, vol.23, no.1,
April 1995, pp.1-2; M. Kalmijn, "trends in Black/Wite Intermarriage,"
Social Forces, vol.72, 1993, pp.119-146.
7. P. Gottfried in Chronicles 1999 review of Glazer.
8. R.D.Alba, Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America, (Yale
University Press, New Haven, 1990).
9. A.M. Dershowitz, The Vanishing American Jew: In Search of Jewish
Identity for the next Century, (Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1997).
The issue underlining all of this is: how many Jews are there in America
in the first place? Mark Twain, "Concerning the Jews," Harper's
Monthly Magazine, September 1899 believed that the Jewish population
in America was immense, and largely undocumented because many Jews did
not wish to be reported as Jews. Today the US Census is not permitted
to count Jews as "Jews," and adds them as "Whites".
Nor are such interracial marriages generally happy, or at least, are
subject to unnecessary stresses and difficulties. This fact seems to
come through most magazine articles on interracial marriage, although
the fault is placed on the shoulder of "racists" rather than
the race traitors. On the conflict in interracial marriages, especially
the betrayal by Black males see e. Thomson, "Race-Mixing: The Key
to World Peace," Liberty Bell, vol.23, no.8, April 1996, pp.21-29.
The Truth at last newspaper supplies a particularly good coverage of
interracial murders. A White, Deborah Evans, 28 years of age, was days
away from giving birth to an interracial child. She was shot in the
head and her womb cut open with a pair of scissors so the murderers
could rip her unborn child from her womb. Her two elder White children
were slain, but her interracial mulatto child was not. One of the killers
was the father of her surviving mulatto child and the baby cut from
her womb. This was all done to give a baby to a Black female friend.
And so it goes on…
10. D.C. Rowe, "IQ, Birth Weight, and Number of Sexual Partners
in White, African American, and Mixed Race Adolescents," Population
and Environment, vol.23, no.6, July 2002, pp.513-524; A.H. Shuey, The
Testing of Negro Intelligence, (Social Science Press, New York, 1996).
11. Editorial, "The Ethnic Distribution of Disease in the United
States," Journal of Chronic Disease, vol.20, 1967, pp.115-118.
12. H. Spencer, "The Comparative Psychology of Man," Popular
Science Monthly, vol.8, 1876, pp.257-269.
13. R. Grant Steen, DNA and Destiny: Nature and Nurture in Human Behavior,
(Plenum Press, New York, 1996).
14. Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, (Cape, London, 1963), pp.661-662.
15. G. Whitney, "On the Races of Man," The Mankind Quarterly,
vol.39, no.3, Spring 1999, pp.319-335; E. Mayr, Animal Species and Evolution,
(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1963).
16. W. B. Provine, "Geneticists and the Biology of Race Crossing,"
Science, vol.182, 1973, pp.790-797.
17. A.M. Ludocivi, The Choice of a Mate, (John Lane, The Bodley Head,
London, 1935).
18. Alan Mcgregor, The Evolutionary Function of Prejudice, (Reprinted
from The Mankind Quarterly, (undated) as a pamphlet).
19. Ibid p.2.
20. T. Dobzhansky, Genetics and the Origins of Species, (Columbia University
Press, New York, 1937).
21. McGregor ibid p.4.
22. Above p.6.
23. Above.
24. Above p.7.
I. Stewart, "Self-Organization in Evolution: A Mathematical Perspective,"
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A, vol.361,
2003, p.1101.
25. Madison Grant, The Passing of the Great Race or the Racial Basis
of European History, (G. Bell and Sons, London 1925), p.xxxi.
26. S.J. Holmes, Studies in Evolution and Eugenics, (George Rautledge
and Sons, London, 1923), p.116.
27. R.D. Kaplan, An Empire Wilderness: Travels into America's Future,
(Random House, New York, 1998).
28. Ibid p.85.
29. M. Lind, The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth
American Revolution, (Free Press, New York, 1995).
30. See J.W. Gregory, The Menace of Color, (Seeley Service and Co. Ltd.,
London, 1925); W. McDougal, Is America Safe for Democracy? (Charles
Scribner's Sons, New York, 1921); and National Welfare and National
Decay, (Methuen, London, 1921).
31. Lothrop Stoddard, The Revolt Against Civilization: The Menace of
the Under-man, (Chapman and Hall, London, 1922).
32. Above p.2.
33. Above p.10.
34. Above p.12.
35. Above.
36. Above p.15.
37. Above p.5.
38. Above p.17.
39. Above.
40. Above p.18.
41. Above p.21.
42. Above p.23.
43. Above.
44. Above pp.24-25. See also E. Pendell, Why Civiizations Self-Destruct,
(Howard Allen, Cape Canaveral, 1977).
A. Jacob, White Man Think Again! (Johannesburg, 1965), p.11.
45. L.A. Waddell, The Makers of Civilization in Race and History, (Angriff
Press, Hollywood, 1929, reprint undated).
46. T. Frank, "Race Mixture in the Roman Empire," American
Historical Review, vol.21, July 1916, pp.689-708, cited p.705.
47. B. Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, (University
of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993).
48. C. Bruck, The Predator's Ball, (Penguin, New York, 1988).
49. Ginsberg, p.198.
50. From M. Todd, The Barbarians: Goths, Franks and Vandals, (B.T. Batsford,
London, 1972).
51. A Jacob, White Man Think Again! Pp.305-306.
52. V. Sarich and F. Miele, Race: The Reality of Human Differences,
(Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 2004).
53. E. Thomson, "Genocide Through Racemixing: The Motives for Mass
Murder," Liberty Bell, July 1996, pp.42-49; K.A. Strom, "Racemixing
- Worse than Murder: Murder is Homicide: Racemixing is Genocide,"
Liberty bell, July 1996, pp.50-56; W. Pierce, "Miscegenation: The
Morality of Death," National Vanguard, March-April 1997, pp.9-12.
54. The work of Cambridge University scientist Bill Amos has been taken
by some to support the thesis of universal mongrelization: L. Dicks,
"Too Close for Comfort," New Scientist, October 18, 2003,
pp.38-41. Because of "inbreeding depressions," the "less
related your parents were, the better you do, across the board."
(p.38) There are great doubts though whether Amos' genetic markers can
be validly taken as indicators on inbreeding. In any case, such a view
conflicts with a wealth of practical biological experience. As Jacob
again notes:
|
