Race, Culture and Nation

IMMIGRATION UNTO DEATH:
HOW THE NORDIC WEST IS COMMITTING RACIAL SUICIDE

by Andrew Ryan and Peter J. White

"In 1914 Nordics accounted for approximately 14 per cent of the world's population, probably an all-time high. Not coincidently, the same year marked the end of a long era of exhilarating Western progress. In 1975 Nordics still comprised 10.5 per cent of the 3.5 billion mortals crowding this over-burdened globe. But by the year 2000, when the earth's population is expected to zoom to 6 or 7 billion, the Nordic component will plummet to 5-6 per cent. Today, scarcely 4 per cent of the babies coming into the world are Nordic.
These figures only refer to whites who are more Nordic then Alpine and more Nordic than Mediterranean. As for pure, or let's say 90 per cent pure Nordics, no more than one hundred million are presently extant and their reproduction rate is so abysmal and their intermarriage rate so high they may be down to 50 million in two or more generations.
The pure or slightly impure Nordic has always been an exotic form of Homo sapiens. Soon he may be so exotic he will become the highest priced serf in history or the easiest of targets for total annihilation."
- Wilmot Robertson [1]

"So I would say that, over the long run, we are going to have a mix. This will be true racially, socially, ethically, geographically, and that's really, finally the best way."
- President John F. Kennedy [2]

"The Census Bureau has just repeated that about half of the American population will soon be non-White or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible - and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever."
- Earl Raab [3]

"The most important thing to remember is that the System is fighting and winning a war of demographics. Every day, more people become dependent on the largesse of Big Brother. Every day, more White women give birth to non-White babies, and every day millions of intelligent, well-bred White women continue their rat-like rush up the corporate ladder, White would-be families are never created. America's collective character is becoming that of a Third World Nation." [4]

THE RACIAL DESTRUCTION OF NORDIC AMERICA

Since the 1960s a series of policy changes have profoundly altered the ethnical and racial composition of the United States. Perhaps the first major change was the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965. This change ended a system of immigration that favored European migrants and opened the floodgates, quite literally to the teeming shores of Asia, Africa and Central America yearning to receive welfare checks. The political rights of minorities were also changed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the traitorous Supreme Court's 1967 ruling in Loving v. Virginia that held that anti-miscegenation laws were unconstitutional. Thus, since the 1960s the non-Hispanic White proportion of the U.S. population has declined, whilst the Hispanic and Asian proportions have dramatically increased. The ethno-racial changes are substantial. In Miami from 1960 to 1990, the White (non-Hispanic) proportion of the population went from 90 per cent to 10 per cent. By 1990 non-Hispanic Whites - a broader category than European-Americans including people of Middle Eastern extraction - were the minority percentage in all but three of the ten largest U.S. cities: New York (46 per cent), Los Angeles (45 per cent), Chicago (46 per cent), Houston (44 per cent), Philadelphia (58 per cent), San Diego (69 per cent), Detroit (22 per cent), Dallas (49 per cent), Phoenix (75 per cent), San Antonio (38 per cent), Washington DC (29 per cent), Baltimore (40 per cent), Atlanta (30 per cent), and as already noted, Miami (10 per cent). [5]

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, given present immigration and ethno-racial birthrates, before 2050 the U.S. will cease to have a White majority, with no major racial or ethnic group constituting a numerical majority. Non-Hispanic Whites' contribution to U.S. population growth is projected to be nothing by 2030 and will begin to shrink in size. [6] Non-Hispanic Whites have failed to maintain the battle of the bedroom in the demographic war zone; 66 per cent of all births are non-Hispanic White and according to the U.S. Census Bureau in 1992, this will fall to a projected 56 per cent in 2010, 48 per cent in 2030 and 42 per cent in 2050 with the non-White contribution being 120 million, to 11 million Whites. The Hispanic population will number 81 million in 2050, Asian and Pacific Islanders 41 million, and Blacks 62 million. Already by 2000 Hispanics had surpassed Blacks as the largest ethno-racial minority in the U.S. All of this is based upon continuity of America's present immigration policy. It is quite likely that as Hispanics and Asians obtain further political power through demographic warfare, immigration levels will increase further than officially estimated. An expanded immigration program may produce a U.S. population of 1.2 billion by 2010. [7] If globalists have their way with a completely open-borders U.S., the resident population is anyone's guess, but in excess of 3 billion people for a short period before ecological collapse, could occur.

Many Conservative and patriotic U.S. intellectuals have viewed these grim demographics with concern, fearing that a breakdown of democracy and social order will occur. [8] European-descended people constitute less than one sixth of the world's population, whereas in 1960 they constituted about one quarter of the world's population, with, on average throughout the White world 1.7 children per woman (with lower figures in Europe: 1.3 in Germany, 1.66 in Britain), for example and with the expected birth rate (i.e. Net Reproduction Rate) projected to be half of that, "passive genocide": and the genetic disappearance seem assured. [9] The net reproduction rate needed to replace an existing population is 2.1. Patrick Buchanan in his book The Death of the West [10] gives a grim account of the impending demographic implosion of the West. The United Nations projects that Europe's population will decrease from 728 million in 2000 to 600 million by 2050. Europeans are dying off faster than they are being replaced. This trend can be reversed by reconversion of western women to the idea that their primary role is bearing and raising children not pursuing their career - or else tens of millions of non-Europeans are admitted, transforming Europe like America further into a Third World. [11]
The cause of this dark transformation need not concern us at this moment; Buchanan sees the explanation as lying in the acceptance of secular libertinism, materialism and other 1960s ideologies grounded in Marxism, but the roots of this "cultural poison" are much deeper. [12]

For the likes of Bill Clinton, as well as probably a majority of U.S. academics in the arts and social science, [13] the "disappearance of blonds" is not a bad thing but a good thing. Some such proponents are explicit haters, seeing Nordic Whites in particular, as Jewess Susan Sontag saw them, as the "cancer of humanity" and look forward to their decline and ultimate demise. Others take the less extreme Clinton line which is that the "disappearance" of a dominant White majority enriches America because it increases "diversity". Although Clinton pretends to be color-blind, he sees non-White migrants as special "strengthening our ties to the world economy". They are "energizing our culture and broadening our vision of the world". They are "renewing our most basic values and reminding us all of what it truly means to be an American". [14] Joel Millman [15] is joyful about White Americans becoming extinct and looks forward to the U.S. being a colony of Asia. Jewish economist Julian Simon (now deceased) delighted at the variety of faces seen in the human zoo that is New York, and it drove the professor "to tears". [16] Economist Tullock, who also supports mass migration, would hire servants if America let in 10 million Asian migrants each year. [17]

The idea of the liberals that the "New Americans" are just like the older European migrants and that they will continue the grand capitalist experiment of the United States of America, is challengeable. A majority of Mexicans believe that the Southwest of the U.S. belongs to Mexico and hope that it will fall away from demographic seizure. Young people are more likely with such irredentist sentiments according to a Zogby International Poll conducted in late May 2002. [18] Hispanic activists have renamed parts of Texas and the area of the Gadsen Purchase "Aztlan", meaning the "brozen continent". California is part of Mexico, they say, and it shall be regained by the sheer weight of numbers. As Brent Nelson observes:
"What "Anglos" see as Chilano separatism is, seen from a perspective South of the Rio Grande, Mexican irredentism. Since even Yanqui historians readily and perhaps unthinkingly "admit" that the U.S. "stole" the South-west from Mexico, and since the moral and historical basis for an irredentist movement has already been established by Chilano authors, it would seem that the rise of Mexican irredentism as a serious political movement awaits only the demographic transformation of the South-west." [19]

This view is confirmed by the California Coalition for Immigration Reform book Reconquista! The Takeover of America. [20] which contains quotations from university professors, activists and elected officials which confirms that there is an Hispanic racialist plan to "reconquer" the Southwest of America. [21] Latino immigration is already locked into a low skilled, low wage nexus, replacing Blacks at the coal face of U.S. poverty. A Latino California will be a giant reservoir for drugs into the rest of the Disunited States of America. Benjamin Mark Cole already sees such Third World squalor engulfing metropolis Los Angeles. He says that LA is now:
"becoming a land of wealth and poverty, a type of modern Dickensian hell. Increasingly, it is becoming an American version of a Third World nation's capital city, growing dependent on cheap labor as its middle class vanishes and wealth eyes poverty across walled barriers." [22]

One of the "joys" of diversity not mentioned by glazed-eyed liberals and multiculturalists are the plethora of diseases brought to the United States by Third World migrants. Since 1980 there has been a lowering of health standards on request from the State Department, to allow in refugees who earlier would have been excluded on health grounds - people with active tuberculosis (and drug resistant forms), infectious leprosy and AIDS/HIV. Hence diseases once thought eradicated are breaking out again in the U.S. Tropic diseases, once unheard of in the U.S. are now here via immigrants, tourists and business travelers - malaria, paragonimiasis, schistomiasis and others. From Latin America we now have Chagas disease which threatens the U.S. blood supply. The disease as yet is not common, but is set to become so with mass Latino migration from southern Mexico and northern Chile, where 18 million people are infected and 50,000 a year die of it. The microbe causing Chagas is carried by the blood sucking "assassin bug". When this bug sucks blood from the mouths of sleeping humans it transfers the microbe causing Chagas. About 10-30 per cent of those who get Chagas have their internal organs literally explode. For others the disease may lie dormant for 10-30 years before destroying them. The danger to Americans arises from a contamination of the blood supply - at present there is no test available to determine whether blood supplies are infected. In Los Angeles where Latino immigrants are common, the odds of getting a transfusion of infected blood from a Chagas infected person is 1 in 5,400: pretty bad odds for those needing blood. [23]

The screening of visitors, immigrants and refugees to the U.S. is completely inadequate and subject to fraud. Inspection at U.S. ports of entry are cursory to the point of useless. [24] Thus TB infections in the U.S. have occurred through migrants from Mexico, the Philippines and Vietnam. The Center for Disease Control recognized in 2000 that immigration "is a major force sustaining the incidence of tuberculosis in the United States". TB is one of the most devastating diseases in the world, with 8 million people becoming ill from the disease each year and 3 million dying. Two billion people carry latent infections and have a 10 per cent chance of developing active infections in their lifetime. Drug resistant varieties of TB are now common. Globalization and mass migration means that the U.S. will, in the not-too-distant future, have TB epidemics as it is in parts of Asia and Africa. [25]
In 1996 the World Health Organization estimated that as many as half of the world's refugees may be infected with TB. However U.S. law prohibits return of refugees where there is a credible fear of political persecution even if they have infectious diseases.

Cholera has entered the U.S. through Latino migrants. The Center for Disease Control found that California has twice the rate of infectious food-borne pathogens associated with human sewerage, such as Campylobacter and Shigella than any other U.S. state. [26] Hepatitis A in California is 2-3 times the national average. Hepatitis B is a gift to America from Asians - Asians make up 4 per cent of the U.S. population but contribute over 50 per cent of U.S. Hepatitis B cases. SARS, which has occurred in the U.S. and Canada in 2003/2004, is from China and Hong Kong. We also have: Leprosy from Brazil, the Caribbean and India; Dengue Fever from Mexico and South America; West Nile virus mainly from Uganda; and Malaria from Mexican and central American immigrants. Clearly there is a disease for everyone.

There is also a horror for everyone. Since 9/11 we should not forget the threat of radical fundamentalist Islamicism. The Koran chapter 98, verse 6 states: "The Jews and Christians and the Pagans will burn forever in the fire of hell. They are the vilest of all creatures". And in chapter 9, verse 5 we find: "Kill the unbelievers wherever ye find them, capture and besiege them and prepare them for every kind of ambush". Islamic history since the 17th century AD has been one of brutality, carnage and slavery, when Islam forcibly expanded its influence and control into South West Europe, Spain and North Africa. In 1999 Archbishop Giuseppe Germano Bernardini said at a Vatican synod that radical Islam has a clear program of expansion and reconquest. The 'open borders" crowd are aiding this holy war (jihad) against the West in allowing them to enter our lands.

The view of Thomas Chittum in Civil War II is that multiculturalism and multiracialism will lead to the breakup of America:
"Simply and directly put, America will explode in tribal warfare in our lifetime and shatter into several ethnically-based nations. And as America breaks up the very concept of multi-ethnic democracy will be forever shattered. Artillery will blast our cities into flaming wastelands infested with psychotic snipers. Packs of feral dogs will tear at charred corpses hanging out of burnt-out tanks. Long columns of doomed refugees will clog our highways. Bands of guerillas will stalk about the country side - raping, looting, murdering, clashing with each other. Food production will all but cease. The hungry will fight to the death over scraps of garbage. Millions will starve, and millions more will die from infectious diseases. Behold the vision of Civil War II." [27]

Conservative writer Samuel Francis in America Extinguished disagrees with Chittum's thesis. He argues that there are other social relationships as powerful as group bonds such as religious and economic bonds, which will also divide the population into conflicting groups. True - but this only confirms the Civil War II thesis. It means that the fight will not only be racial but religious (e.g. Islamic fundamentals vs infidels [= everybody else] and economic [e.g. revenge on the right). Some urban gangs he says are already mixed: true again, but most are not. It is clearly difficult for the conservative mind, drenched with capitalism and the ideological baggage of modernity to contemplate … the end.

Francis says that war may not occur. Urban gangs haven't taken over the city yet (why should they when social order ensures good pickings). He is right though in saying that Americans are couch cabbages who have few interests beyond tinnies and TV. But this applies to decadent White Americans, and then primarily Nordics. Hispanics, Blacks and Asians are in general not soft, and as the LA riots showed, when the LAPD retreated because armed Black rioters had heavier weapons than themselves, Korean shopkeepers fought these rampaging Blacks and defeated them. Still, if a situation of social breakdown does occur, it is not impossible that Francis' couch cabbages may suddenly find courage. In Dante's Inferno it is said that there is no misery greater than having had it all, losing it and looking back on the happier times. Perhaps the threat of starvation and cannibalism (where the couch cabbages are lunch) may bring back a bit of manly backbone. The removal of aggression-inhibiting forces would enable the White male brain to once more function normally, i.e. aggressively, seeking to dominate rather than negotiate. In any case Chittum's thesis still proceeds even if Whites allow themselves to be used as cheap meat targets. Battlefield USA will be between the colored races fighting over the spoils.

In many respects battlefield USA is already here as indicated by the mind-boggling statistics on U.S. interracial crime. [28]
Here are, in dot point form, a few statistics that are already out-of-date:

· African Americans commit 90% of the approximately 1, 700,000 interracial violent crimes occurring in the U.S. every year.
· Blacks are 50 times likelier to commit violent crimes against whites than vice versa.
· More than 30,000 white women were raped by black men in 1991, whereas 5,400 black women were raped by white men. The black interracial rape rate was 38 times the white rate.
· Since blacks are more prone than members of other races to commit crimes police stop and question frequently. (They also stop men more often than women and young people more often than old people.)
· Hispanics commit violent crime at approximately three times the white rate.
· Blacks are five to eight times more violent than whites.
· When blacks commit violent crimes they target whites 56% of the time. When whites commit violent crimes they target blacks 2% to 3% of the time.
· Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes.
· Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate. Hispanics commit violent crimes at approximately three times the white rate. Asian crime is one-half to three-quarters the white rate.
· Blacks are up to 250 times likelier than whites to engage in multiple offender or group interracial violence.
· Hate crimes against Hispanics are listed in FBI reports, but Hispanic perpetrators are not listed.
· Hispanic offenders are often classified as whites, which inflates the white offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit few or no hate crimes.
· 1,276,030 interracial crimes were recorded in 1994, of which 1,140,670 (89%) were the work of the blacks.
· Whites committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 62.55 per 100,000 while the black rate was 3,494.63 per 100,000. The average black is 56 times more likely to assault a white man than a white to assault a black.
· The 1,140,670 acts of violence committed by blacks against whites constitute 65.3% of all crimes committed by blacks.

According to U.S. Department of Justice records, from 1977-1997 there have been 6.6. million violent crimes of murder, rape, robbery and assault and 20 per cent were interracial. Of that 20 per cent, 90 per cent of the victims were White. Blacks murder Whites 18 times the rate that Whites murder Blacks and Black on White assaults are 21 times the opposite. If this is not a race war (of a one-way kind), it will do until a real race war comes our way! [29]

In Columbus, Ohio police had a hard time catching Black rapists; two White women, for example, delayed reporting suspicious Black men because the women did not want to appear prejudiced! Perhaps when more events like the following occur, this mind daze will end. On June 11, 2000 after the annual Puerto Rican Day parade in Centennial Park 33 women, including a French woman on honeymoon and two British tourists were stripped and sexually assaulted by up to 50 assailants. Nearly all the attackers were non-White and nearly all the victims were White. Black fingers were jabbed into White vaginas of girls as young as 14 years. White men were bashed, held down and made to watch as their women were sexually assaulted. The media photographed only the few Black female victims and denied that the crime had a racial aspect. [30]
Police refused to intervene out of fear of rioting. Black Springbreak 2000: Black college students in the Biloxi and Gulfport area of Mississippi, numbering about 20,000 ate in restaurants, walked out without paying, smashed convenience stores and urinated in the streets. When White women were spotted they were grabbed, stripped, digitally raped and videotaped. No punishment. On the other hand, 25 year old White Alex Curtis was given 10 years in jail for allegedly writing some unkind things about Maurice Casuto, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League, outside of a synagogue near Casuto's home. A Bad racist, writing on the walls must be punished, but not a pack of rapists.

Another riot, Seattle's Fat Tuesday riot involved Whites and Blacks. However there was a group of 12-15 Black males and an equal number of Black females who chose White victims, usually blond, to beat to a pulp. One young blond man was beaten to death. News footage taken at the scene reveals gangs of predatory Blacks attacking Whites. One White woman had 19 Black hands on her body. Welcome to the future of America. [31]

A COOK'S TOUR OF RACIAL DECAY ELSEWHERE

Congratulations, liberals. South Africa under White rule was once an economic powerhouse. Believing in the Mandela myth ("with our matches and our necklaces [i.e. burning tires around an African's throat] we will liberate this country" - Winnie Mandela). South Africa is the country with the highest per capita rape rate in the world: one woman is raped every 25 seconds, predominately by Blacks. For each rape notified another 35 take place, and it is projected that one out of two women can expect to be raped in their life.
There has been a surge in the rape of children and babies fuelled by the primitive belief that sex with a virgin will protect against AIDS (never mind what is in the aggressor's blood stream). Thus, six Blacks on November 6, 2001 raped a 9-month-old girl (we do not know the race of this poor baby). Blacks in Johannesburg often cordon off a whole block and then systematically gang-rape every woman and girl. One in nine South Africans, mainly Blacks are infected with HIV/Aids, but an increasing number of Boer women, raped by Blacks are being infected.

Hundreds of White farmers have been killed by Blacks in South Africa since 1993. The same situation of farm killings exists in Zimbabwe where a mad President permits White farmers to be slaughtered by Blacks. Mugabe's farm policy has brought misery for both Blacks and Whites. He has ignored his own High Court which found the farm invasions illegal. The country's food supply is under threat, unemployment has reached 50 per cent and one quarter of the population is infected with AIDS. Saint Nelson Mandela supports Mugabe, as does his successor Thabo Mbeiki, a man who has told Whites: "You are our enemies, and we are full of anger." [32]

The South African majority voted for Black rule giving up the country that their forefathers wrestled from the wilderness 350 years earlier. The Boers settled virtually vacant land. The British imported Blacks to use as cheap labor in the diamond mines. The same internationalists who are destroying the rest of the West. The Boers were betrayed by their Church, the universities and other institutions - as we are. Thus they voted for Black rule with all the other examples of Black rule around them - Rwanda, Angola, Zimbabwe. Indeed chaos and slaughter characterize much of Africa - as does poverty, corruption, disease and tribalism. [33] Some of this is due to colonialism, but as the Black American Rich Burg points out, Africa has always been a violent land plagued by wars, famines and oppression. [34] Thus, as the ultimate humiliation White Afrikaner separatists were forced to lobby the UN (unsuccessfully of course) to be classified as an oppressed indigenous people. If only the AWB had had leaders as brave as those that led the soldiers in the Boer War instead of the buffoons that pretended to be leaders. [35]

There are many images of the future of Whites in Africa. That of British tourist 28-year-old Julie Ward, in Kenya, tortured, bludgeoned to death and dismembered in a Kenyan game park. That of AWB member Alwyn Wolfaardt crouching by a car, hands in the air in surrender, surrounded by bodies - before being murdered by the Blacks' "police" in front of the international media contingent. But perhaps American student, blond Nordic Amy Biehl best epitomizes South Africa - and our future plight. Amy, a beaming glazed-eyed liberal went to South Africa for anti-racist purposes. She was with Black friends when their car was ambushed in the Guguletu township by Black youths shouting "Death to the Settler". At the trial the killers laughed and cheered when testimony was given that Amy Biehl could not stand and was groaning in pain. Her parents accepted the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission's decision to release the three men convicted for the murder. The parents were not angry with them, only at the wicked apartheid system that drove them to murder! At the 1997 amnesty hearings, the Biehls hugged the attacker's family members and shook hands with their daughter's murderers. They went on National Public Radio to express support for the killer's release. And they now run an anti-violence project in Cape Town. [36]

It would be hard to invent a politically correct fantasy as over-the-top as this story. Nevertheless, the fate of Amy Biehl, like that of Saint-Dominigue [37] will be theirs unless resistance occurs. Johannesburg, built by the Boers was once a glowing steel and glass jewel in a sea of darkness, dust and dirt. Now, although the skyscrapers still stand for a time, hordes of squatters following Saint Mandela's mantra of a better life for all, now warm themselves by fires made in old oil cans that blaze in the night in foyers of buildings that were once the headquarters of businesses. Goats freely wander in the hallways, scaring hordes of rats that feed and breed on the endless mounds of rubbish and waste. Lawns that were once well-manicured have been replaced by corrugated iron huts that form a city within a city. Muggers prowl the city center in packs making it impossible for business people to get safely to work. Business has retreated to the outer suburbs. Some of our cities are not far off this. An explosion of occult-related activities among Africans is also occurring right across Africa, including ritual killing, witchcraft, zombie conjuring, organ harvesting from the kidnapping of young people and so on. Africa is once again the dark continent, a diseased cesspool of violence.

We will not discuss in any detail the violence and disorder which is the rule of life in South America, since our concern is primarily with the disintegration of the Aryan West. But one statistic in passing: deaths from firearms are higher in Rio de Janeiro than in Sierra Leone. Brazil spends 10 per cent of its national income on internal security. [38]

What about the joyful multiracial society that was given to Britain as a reward for defeating Hitler's vile plan of Aryan world supremacy? [39] For a start UK Whites will be a minority by 2100 - a slight improvement on our fate. Whites will be a minority in London by 2010. In the early 1950s there were only a few, tens of thousands of non-Whites in the UK. By 1991 there were 3 million - 6 per cent of the population. Ethnic minorities grew at a rate of 2-4 per cent per year with a net immigration rate running on average at 185,000 per year, but at times reaching 250,000 migrants and asylum seekers per year, not counting illegals. The new migrants have a high fertility whereas the fertility rate of White British is below replacement level. [40] Thus if the population of ethnic minorities grows at a rate of 4 per cent per year, Whites will become a minority before 2100. [41]

Concern about commonwealth migration was raised by the Conservative politician Enoch Powell in his famous "Rivers of Blood" speech in 1968: "As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see the river Tiber foaming with much blood". The allusion was to a passage in Virgil's Aeneid where Aeneas hears a prophecy that when he returns to Italy there will be a war so bloody that "foaming blood" will fill the Tiber. The Establishment predictably shouted Powell down as a racist although opinion polls showed that 74 per cent of the British population at the time agreed with him. It is not too difficult to find conventional academic sources which viewed this migration with concern. A.H. Birch in Nationalism and National Integration, for example, has said:
"Since 1955 the arrival of large numbers of Indians, Pakistanis, East African Asians and West Indians has created coloured minorities in English cities amounting to two and a half million people by 1987, a figure likely to rise to about three and a half million by the turn of the century. About 70 per cent are of Asian extraction and the remainder are of Afro-Caribbean origin. This development has given rise to so much social tension and sporadic violence that it would be foolish to pretend that it has been other than disintegrative, at least in the short run. The problems arising from it may be resolved with the passage of time, but they cannot be ignored." [42]

The orthodox explanation of this large-scale migration is that it arose out of a "mistake". Birch explains: "The arrival of the Saxons in the Dark Ages is the only other example of mass immigration into Britain. It is therefore all the more remarkable that immigration since 1955 was not the result of a deliberate government policy but the accidental by-product of policies formulated for quite different reasons. The crucial decisions were taken in the years 1946-8. In 1946 Canada became the first Commonwealth country to introduce its own citizenship, as distinct from British subjecthood, an example that was followed by India and Pakistan after they achieved independence in 1947. As it was decided in 1947 that nearly all of Britain's colonial territories would be prepared for political independence as soon as this seemed practicable, it would have been logical for the British government to accept that the British Empire was on its way out and to abandon the whole concept of a British subjecthood to which all colonial residents were entitled.
In the event, the British Labour government, with the full support of the Conservative opposition, decided that the Empire should be transformed into a multiracial Commonwealth and that all its citizens should remain British subjects as well as being citizens of their own countries. In retrospect, it is clear that these decisions were based on unrealistic assessments of the future and were disadvantageous in their long-term effects. They played a major part in shaping Britain's fateful decision not to join the European Economic Community at its inception in 1957, when Britain would have been a welcome influential member and could have probably prevented the Community from adopting the extravagant agricultural policy that now weighs heavily upon its (and British) finances. The decisions also had unforeseen consequences in respect of immigration. As a lawyer generally observed: "by preserving … imperial and increasingly outmoded concepts of citizenship, the Atlee government perpetrated confusion about who "belonged" to the United Kingdom." [43]
This standard explanation is, in our opinion, superficial and inadequate and ignores the active role that Marxists and the Jewish lobby had in Britain, as in the United States, Canada and Australia at over-turning the existing migration policies. [44] We will return again to this issue of "why", at least for the United States, later.

British papers seem to be devoting more critical attention to the immigration issue than ever before, and especially good are articles by journalists Anthony Browne, Melanie Phillips and Peter Hitchin. The costs of building migrant homes (£125 billion) and the health ramifications of migration (e.g. rise of TB, AIDS brought by African migrants into Scotland, diseases brought into Britain by bogus asylum seekers kill more Britains than "terrorism", infected migrants are increasing twenty-fold the rate of hepatitis B, and so on) are all documented. On the bizarre and chilling side, article headlines from the UK Mail are not matched for frankness even compared to the United States:
· "Bluestock: Private School, Oxford degree and glittering career ahead… then Gemma met the man of her dreams in an African mud hut!"
· "This 15-year old girl vanished from our streets. Her story reveals a chilling world of children sold into sexual slavery - subsidized by the British taxpayers."
· "Her mother was once a lesbian, but now has six children by four men. Little Chelsea calls two of them daddy, (although neither is her real father who happens to be gay). Confused? Then what hope do you think she has?" (Chelsea is a Nordic blond child).
And so it goes on. An attractive blond British civil servant married her Black lover in jail where he is doing time for stomping to death their 3-wee- old infant because she wouldn't stop crying. [45] Beyond that: a boy's body - "Adam" - was pulled from the Thames. "Adam" was from Benin, a West African region infamous for the exportation of human flesh for ritual sacrifices. "Adam" was shipped to the UK for ritual sacrifice and dismemberment. This is part of a new problem of the trade in human flesh for witchcraft purposes among Britain's 200,000 strong West African community. In 2003 Customs stopped one man who had a human tongue around his neck and carrying a consignment of dried human penises. [46]
Eighty per cent of London's muggings are by Blacks. Blacks in London are 14 per cent of the population but account for 72 per cent of all rapes. [47] Manchester's notorious Moss Side district is Britain's most lawless area. There rival gang leaders fight for control of cannabis, cocaine and heroin. Even the children of immigrants from the West Indies have acquired Israeli-made Uzi machine pistols, whilst White British people are now virtually unarmed due to the implementation of some of the harshest firearms legislation in the world. The media is silent because of the racial dimension to this violence. According to the UK Mail of January 14, 2002, crime under "New Labour" since 1997 has rocketed: gun crime up 103 per cent, murders up 80 per cent, robbery up 80 per cent, burglary up 62 per cent, violence up 138 per cent, criminal damage up 277 per cent and drug crime up 458 per cent. As Leo McKinstry put it: "After decades of advancing multiculturalism, Britain is the most violent country in Europe, with the highest rates of gun crime, drug-taking and street robbery." [48]

Freedom of speech and the right of association are fast disappearing in the multicultural fascist state of Britain, and the police are agents of thought control. Thus an Exeter man was sentenced to 200 hours of community service in October 2002 on the charge of "religiously aggravated threatening behaviour." He had a heated argument with a Muslim neighbor who called 9/11 "a glorious day" and bin Laden "a great man'. The Muslim was not prosecuted. As in the Soviet Union, racism is being considered as a form of mental illness to be treated by psychiatry. A 36-year old White plumber, married with children, made a casual remark while a passenger in a van passing a memorial to the multicultural martyr, Black Stephen Lawrence. "Best thing that could have happened." He is overheard by some Leftist women laying flowers and finds himself in court charged with "causing racially aggravated alarm or distress," due to his "hostile and malicious remark." Such is the degeneracy and corruption of British traditions of free speech and the oppressiveness of the multicultural thought control State.
British Home Secretary Jack Straw plans to abolish trial by jury for most crimes, expect the most serious, and intends to criminalize racially offensive language even in the privacy of one's home! [49] The EU is proposing to ban "racism" based on the oppressive German code, to make it a criminal offence to publicly disseminate any material expressing racism or xenophobia. Translation: any pro-White sentiment, but not of course, non-White "racism". British citizens could be extradited to other EU countries for "racism trials". The Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, put in place by the Blair government recommended that "Britain be called a multi-ethnic, multi-faith society," and it urged Parliament to reject further reference to "British" because of the connotation of racial exclusivity and imperialism (see: www.runnymedetrust.org). [50]
The Blair government initiated the process of giving the three northern regions in England, Yorkshire and Humberside, the North East and North West the chance to devolve from England by referendum. The devolved regions will have a degree of autonomy, being responsible for their own costs of education, health, social services and the rules of trade with the EU. They will become part of Europe, not England, and funding for major projects will come from Brussels. England then will be sliced up and handed to Brussels on a plate. Polls conducted in each of the three northern districts suggest that they will all support devolution.
The latest European Union map no longer shows England as a country. Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales are shown but not England, which has been deconstructed into a collection of artificially constructed regions. How did this happen? Under the Tories, 10 government offices for the regions were set up. These offices were given unelected assemblies by Blair, with boundaries based on regional development agencies and not the old counties. These regional bodies made up of councilors and business men are now establishing offices in Brussels to make sure they are represented in councils of the European Union. Under globalization, countries will not exist and no group will have effective say about its destiny. [51] This is clearly English-hatred taken to its logical conclusion. [52] Of course it is not English-hatred alone which is doing this: Brussels also threatens the very existence of France as Jean-Claude Barreau argues in La France Va-t-elle Disparaître? [53]
In Scandinavia, the passive genocide of the Nordic race seems to be the establishment's accepted principle of Aryan annihilation. In Sweden, one third of all babies born are now of alien stock. Richard McCulloch wrote these words in 1990 about the influx of Africans and Asians into Scandinavia: "East Asians, especially Vietnamese abound… The races of the Indian subcontinent - Asian Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans - have invaded Scandinavia in multitudes that remind one of Jean Raspail's prophetic novel The Camp of the Saints. Their absence, of course, will hardly be missed in their own homelands, which have a combined population of over one billion… On the ferry from Fjrland to Balestrand on Jogne-Fjord, I noted a Norwegian couple with a toddler East Asian adoptee and a Norwegian man with an utterly angelic towheaded daughter about four years of age. As I pondered the juxtaposition of these sights, I realized that the Asian adoptee, and each of the multitude of other non-Nordish children now in Scandinavia, not only replace or displace Nordish children who could have existed were it not for their cowbird-like substitution, they cancel out those who do exist. Given the dominance of their genetic traits, they cancel them out on a more than one-for-one basis… The grim arithmetic of this cancellation is the new math of Nordic racial destruction.
Scandinavia has the most distinct, delicately balanced, recessive and vulnerable gene pool in the world. The phenomenal angelic beauty that is its finest expression is based on a unique constellation of recessive genetic traits that could be easily shattered beyond restoration by even a relatively small injection of discordant incompatible genes… This is a staggering thought, and a sobering assessment of the destructive power of dominant non-Nordish genes on a Nordish population. The angelic girl was a sign of Nordish life. The Asian adoptee was a sign of its destruction by intermixture and replacement, the soft form of genocide that now seems fated for the Nordish race." [54]
In Belgium the European Arab League, headed by Abou JahJah is demanding official state recognition of the Arabic language as well as an Arab quota for government jobs. An Arab government in Europe? Sooner than you think. [55]

WHY HAVE WE ALLOWED THEM TO MURDER US IN OUR SLEEP?

In the case of the United States, Peter Brimelow in Alien Nation [56] sees the 1965 Act as passed in a deceptive way but concludes that it got through by "technical incompetence". Consider though these statements by the Kennedy's. Immigration Subcommittee Chairman, Senator Edward Kennedy said:
"First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same… Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset… Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia… In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think." [57] Robert Kennedy had this to say about future Asian immigration to the U.S.:
"It would be approximately 5,000 Mr. Chairman, after which immigration from that source would virtually disappear: 5,000 would come in the first year, but we do not expect that there will be any great influx after that." [58]
It defies belief to suppose that the Kennedy's at least were unaware that they were opening the U.S. up to an invasion from the world. The previous immigration Act, based on quotas, was put in place precisely because of that reason. John F. Kennedy's book A Nation of Immigrants (1958) revived the idea of mass colored immigration as a way to change the ethnic composition of the U.S. Kennedy called for immigration change as a Senator in 1959 and as President in 1963. The idea that the sacred womanizing prototype for Clinton, John F., could be a traitorous bad egg is difficult for Americans to accept, being brought up on the divine myth of "Camelot".
As shown by the evidence assembled by Chilton Williamson Jr. in The Immigration Mystique [59] the pro-immigration forces went into attack after World War II, which itself had created an immigration force. Representative Walter Judd formed the Citizens Committee to Repeal Chinese Exclusion, chaired by Richard Walsh. [60] The defeat of National Socialism was used by the Marxists to "discredit' racial theories. [61]
President Truman saw the national origins scheme as "absurd and cruel" and "outdated". President Eisenhower signed an amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act, authorizing an increase of 30,000 annual immigrant visas. However it was John F. Kennedy as president, who "found a means of evading [the national origin system] by authorizing 18,000 alien relatives of recent immigrants to enter the United States outside the quotas legally allotted to their respective countries." As Robert F. Kennedy said in a forward to John F. Kennedy's A Nation of Immigrants:
"Every step forward in immigration legislation since World War II bore the John F. Kennedy imprint: the Displaced Persons Act and the Refugee Relief Act, which he sponsored while in Congress; the 1957 bill to bring families together, which he led to passage in the Senate; and the comprehensive reform of our law which he recommended to Congress as President." [63]
John F. Kennedy had a personal passion for immigration and a resentment of the WASP establishment; as Williamson Jr. says:
"for Kennedy, the national origins system was a personal insult, an unwelcome reminder that for all the Kennedy Clan's pretension to a noble distinction, they were considered no more than shanty Irish bootleggers by the very people whom they wished most to impress." [64] Thus: "For John F. Kennedy, immigration reform was a club with which to beat down his own social insecurities, as well as the cause of them." [65] Likewise for Senator Edward Kennedy who said at the time of the undermining of the national origins system that: "the ethnic mix will not be upset. Contrary to charges in some quarters, it will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area." [66] Even a basic understanding of American history would debunk such a statement. On the contrary, the Kennedy's knew what changes this immigration reform would bring and they supported it. Their agenda was to destroy WASP America.

From all this we have arrived at a situation where, because the largely White American state of Iowa's population is not growing rapidly enough, State officials have launched a campaign to bring the Third World to Iowa, recruiting non-Whites in Mexico, Asia and Africa. [67] This spurious argument is made even though Iowa's population increased by 5.4 per cent during the 1990s - not enough say the racially corrupt genociders. And it won't be enough until every White American has disappeared down the drain of history.

In an insightful essay "The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demograph", the Jew Stephen Steinlight clearly states that Jews in the past have been influential in manipulating and controlling America's immigration program. [68] Steinlight's thesis is that the creation of a non-European (non-White) America so swiftly may cause problems for Jews. The new migrants have no "historical experience of the Holocaust" (i.e. guilt) or "knowledge of the persecution of the Jews" (i.e. guilt) and who see Jews as "the most privileged and powerful White Americans". Translation: there is a danger in letting in migrants not indoctrinated like Pavlovian dogs. Steinlight thus fears the waning of Jewish power (Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television and the news industry'). But until that time the Jewish community is still "in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective conditions that support our agendas." "Divide and conquer," you read it correctly.

Another Jewish scholar, Walter Block of Loyola University, New Orleans has written the following interesting remarks about Jewish support for the non-White immigration into predominately homogenous White countries:
"There can be little doubt that the Jews have been seared by their exposure to Nazism. As a result, the rallying cry "never again" has become the motto of this community. There is one thing that distinguished National Socialist Germany from many countries: it was a predominately homogenous, Christian, white country; as a result, the Jews have determined that whatever else the U.S. and other Western countries are and may become, they shall not resemble that demographic make-up… it is in this context that Jewish support for immigration such as the NAACP, for affirmative action (which comes largely at the expense of male, White Christians as well as their own group) can be explained.
There is of course no necessary connection between this concern and socialism. The world might well have been a place wherein the desire for race-mixing had little or nothing to do with pro- or anti- free enterprise sentiment. To explore the reasons why this should have become a rallying of the left, not the right, would take us too far afield. Suffice it to say, however, that in modern political context, there is little doubt that supporters of international socialism favor such policies, while nationalists do not (although the international capitalists and neo-Conservatives do). Thus, this is yet another phenomenon that impels Jews in the direction of socialism, even though it stems from issues far removed from questions of economic freedom.
What can be reasonably said about this hypothesis? In my view, we can only say at this point that the jury is still out. It has at least superficial plausibility, in that it accords with the strictures of quo bono. That is, if it were true, this thesis does at least point to a gain that could be garnered by the Jewish community, acting in such a manner.
Speaking as a Jew myself, one who is reasonably cognizant of the events occurring in this community, I can say that I have never heard any reason to believe it is true. This hypothesis will be rejected by some, out of hand, as anti-Semitic. That is not at all the position I am taking. As a disinterested observer, as a social scientist, my role is to get that extra inch closer to the truth. It is incompatible with this role to reject out of hand any hypothesis, no matter how despicable it may sound. All that can be said for this one, at the present time is that while Jews may conceivably have this motive, there is no evidence that they do, or that their actions have been motivated by it.
However, there is something that can be said against it. This hypothesis is rooted in Jewish experience with the long history of expulsions and persecution in so many European countries which reached a climax in Germany during World War II. Yet there are numerous countries that are at least as homogeneously white and Christian as Nazi Germany, and, also, Nordic for that matter, which have not spawned any anti-Jewish holocausts. Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland and especially Denmark spring to mind. It is an interesting hypothesis, which cannot be rejected out of hand on a priori or "racist" grounds, but that does not mean we must accept it without question." [69]

These remarks are interesting because they ignore all the evidence that Kevin MacDonald has assembled which indicates that the Jewish lobby has never supported immigration restriction. This question will be explored elsewhere. C.H. Douglas remarked in Social Credit: "of the Jews themselves it may be said that they exhibit the race-consciousness idea to an extent unapproached elsewhere, and it is fair to say that their success in many walks of life is primarily due to their adaptation to an environment which has been moulded in conformity with their own ideal." [70] However it is highly likely, as Steinlight has observed, that a non-White America is not likely to be sympathetic to Jewish interests. The Jewish elites in backing non-White migration have made a fatal mistake.

American Conservatism and the Racial Genocide of Nordic America

"[The Jewish neocons] are really a kind of Masonic secret society who preach one doctrine to the masses but maintain among their inner circles an esoteric doctrine that glorifies power, deception, and repression… Jewish identity also undoubtedly shapes neocon support for immigration (as a means of protecting against the emergence of anti-Jewish movements by diluting the Old Stock ethnic homogeneity of the United States)."
- Samuel Francis [71]
Consider: the German newborn baby of the millennium was a Turkish baby born to two "guest workers"; the media made this the typical "German" of the millennium. Consider also the position of "intellectual" Jürgen Habermas who sees the predemocratic history of Germany as nothing but a "prelude to Nazism". Hence the need for a massive immigration to deliberately change German identity. As Gottfried has said: "The only other reason Habermas can find for even minimal German cultural identity in negative: the need for German atonement for the Nazi past, which should take the form of democratic socialization." [72] In other words: indoctrination and thought-control.

"Genocide" according to standard dictionaries, means the 'mass murder of a racial, national or religious group." According to this narrow definition, the destruction of the White race through multicultural methods of psycho-political warfare, does not constitute "genocide". However the term "genocide", as the left reminds us has been used by the United Nations to include all actions that threaten the survival of a group and in turn lead to the possible disappearance of that group. More precisely Article II of the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide 1948 (which was unanimously declared by the General Assembly to be an already existing crime at international law) defines "genocide" as:
"any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
The crime of genocide requires a "special intent", the acts being done with "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a…group, as such".
Article 3 provides that (a) genocide; (b) conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) attempt to commit genocide; (e) complicity in genocide, are punishable.

By this definition genocide applies to national groups including the people of Northern European descent (Nordics) in the United States, Australia and South Africa and elsewhere. Genocide has been committed against Nordic people of America, Britain, Europe, Canada, Australia and "Rhodesia" through the deliberate disintegration of their socio-political institutions, culture, language, national sentiment, religion, economic security, personal security, liberty, health, dignity and life. Racial integration has the effect of physically destroying White groups in whole or in part. Genocide means, the late biologist Garret Hardin pointed out, the extermination of race, and this can be done just as effectively by the passive genocide approach of replacing one slow breeding group (Nordics) by faster breeding groups (Third World colored) so that the genes of one group replace the genes of another. [73] The race war of Black and Asiatic criminals against White Americans, Europeans, Canadians, South Africans and Australians is a more active form of genocide. If you don't believe this, then reflect upon what the system would call the actions of the Whites if they treated Black/Asiatics, in the same way as described in this work. "Genocide" also applies to assaults upon identity, where under the regime of multicultural political correctness European culture is considered evil. Thus multiculturalism and multiracialism are genocidal policies. However don't expect the United Nations or the International Criminal Court to seriously consider our case: the genocide of the white race has been put to the UN without a response. The Hague's 'kangaroo court' seems to be interested only in pursuing crimes against the new world order.
American conservatives have been next to useless in combating the core issue of the threat to White (and specifically Nordic/Aryan survival). Certainly it has been useful to cite the economic and environmental costs of US immigration. But the American conservative mind cannot progress beyond a certain point before the horror of the racial abyss results in a systems-shut down. In his excellent book, The Eleventh Hour, British nationalist John Tyndall describes the modern liberal as a creature incapable of independent thought, having had his brain removed and the empty cranial space being replaced by a more powerful pre-programmed robot brain, which resulted in the liberal firing, not at the enemy, but at their own side. [74] The liberal has been induced to hate his own people and love all others, including his natural and traditional enemies. This is an act of pure racial self-hate, leading to a racial death-wish - "I am a liberal - I mean, so altruistically moral - I never take my own side in a quarrel." (Robert Frost). The same can be said about conservatism.
Michael Lind, himself a multiculturalist, writes in his critique of American conservatism, that the movement has been taken over by a network of well-connected New York Jewish intellectuals. [75] He then goes on to document that conservative movement "pretending to represent one-hundred-percent Americanism, is disproportionately staffed by immigrants and subsidized by foreign interests." [76] The intellectual alliance of the Right is made up of a disproportionate number of Jews, Catholics and European (non-Northern) immigrants. Let us call this group "Kosher-conservatives" for the group is generally committed to values typically embraced by cosmopolitan Jews - such as the elimination of tariffs, open borders, free trade, an end to the Welfare State, multiculturalism and multiracialism. They believe in Americas as it is today. [78]
Thus we find Thomas Fleming saying "if White Americans really do begin to think of themselves as nothing but White, they will have lost everything they have that is worth defending.' [79] Never mind that one could use articles from his own magazine Chronicles to show that White Americans have already lost, or are close to losing America. [80] Lawrence Auster, author of The Path to National Suicide thinks immigration is good adding to the "cosmopolitan mix of our metropolitan areas." He does not support exclusion of non-Europeans as "America is no longer the homogenous society it was in the 19th century." He claims that racialism is fundamentally wrong as it cuts us off from "common humanity" and "universal moral principles". [81] And so it goes on. All of this could have been written by multicultural liberals.
The survival pf Nordics - people of Northern European descent - clearly requires a more satisfactory philosophical basis than "Kosher-conservatism". [82] Papers and research defending the Nordic people, a task begun by great American writers in the early 20th century such as Madison Grant will be published in the future by the present authors. Our survival depends upon losing our racial amnesia and regaining our sense of racial identity. If Jews, Blacks, Asians, Southern Europeans and the rest are permitted a racial identity, then why not us, the Nordic, Northern European descended people?

NOTES

1. Wilmot Robertson (Cover Statement) Instauration, vol.4, no.4, 1979.
2. President John F. Kennedy quoted in the New York Times, September 13, 1963.
3. Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, February 19, 1993, p.23.
4. The Populist Observer, July 1989, p.10.
5. J. Owen, "New American Nations," Right Now! July-September, 1997, pp.12-13, cited p.12.
6. S.T. Francis, America Extinguished: Mass Immigration and the Disintegration of American Culture, (Americans for Immigration Control, Monterey, 2002).
7. B.M. Burke, "America Bursting at the Seams," The Social Contract, Summer 2001, pp. 262-263.
8. See for example, M.D. Wolpin, "Illusion vs. Perversity: "Multiculturalism" and the Prospects for Democracy," The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, vol.25, 2000, pp.79-98; L. Auster, "Multiculturalism and the War Against White America," American Renaissance, vol.8, August 1994, pp.1, 3-8; S. Francis "Whose Future? Projections of a Non-White America," The Social Contract, Summer 1998, pp.293-299; J.E. Fallon, "The Impact of Immigration on US Demographics," The Journal of Social, Political and Economics Studies, vol.21, no.2, Summer 1996, pp.141-166. Samuel Huntington, Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity, (Simon & Shuster, New York, 2004). Huntington sees that the end of America is nigh: "In the end, the United States of America will suffer the fate of Sparta, Rome and other human communities." He also quotes the Jew Robert Kaplan: "America, more than any other nation, may be born to die."
9. M.W. Masters, "The Lethal Gene," The Social Contract, Winter 1999-2000, pp.139-142. In this Blade Runner society, social breakdown of White families is occurring at a surprising rate. An epidemic of teenage prostitution is erupting, often with White children of middle to upper middle class backgrounds. The movie Thirteen (2003) is a trashy illustration of this social problem. The girls are often enslaved by Black or Asian pimps: N. Rosit, "White Slavery, 1999," American Renaissance, vol.11, no.2, February 2000, pp.1, 3-5.
10. P.J. Buchanan, The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization, (St. Martin's Press, New York, 2002).
11. A. Brown, "Birth Rates: Who is Winning the Race?" American Renaissance, November 2000, pp.6-8.
12. See: J. Attarian, "A Red Flag on the Highway," The Social Contract, Spring 2002, pp.221-228.
13. See: J.W. Bendersky, "The Disappearance of Blonds: Immigration, Race and the Reemergence of "Thinking White"," Telos, no.104, Summer 1995, pp.135-157; D.I. Warren, "White Americans as a Minority," Telos, no.104, Summer 1995, pp.127-134; D. Maharidge, The Coming White Minority: California's Eruptions and America's Future, (Random House, New York, 1996).
14. Clinton's Portland State University Speech, June 13, 1998, perhaps the most traitorous speech ever made by an "American" President.
15. J. Millman, The Other Americans, (Viking, New York, 1997).
16. J. Simon, Economic Consequences of Immigration, (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge MA, 1989), cited pp.45-46.
17. G. Tullock, "Review of Peter Brimlow: Alien nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster," Public Choice, vol.89, no.3-4, December 1996, pp.426-430, cited p.428.
18. See Immigration Watch, August-September 2002, at p.1; B. Nelson, "El Republica del Norte," The Social Contract, Fall 2000, pp.42-45; M.H. Chang, "Multiculturalism, Immigration and Aztlan," The Social Contract, Spring 2000, pp.207-211. On immigration as a form of demographic warfare see: J.W. Jamieson, "Migration as an Economic and Political Weapon," The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, vol.24, no.3, 1999, pp.339-348; F. Morriset and W.C. Mackey, "Population Differentials: A View of the 21st Century Through a Course Biocultural Filter," The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, vol22, no.1, Spring 1997, pp.83-98; A.B. Schmookler, The Parable of the Tribes: The Problem of Power in Social Evolution, (University of California Press, Berkley, 1984); M.S. Teitelbaum and J. Winter, A Question of Numbers: High Migration, Low Fertility and the Politics of National Identity, (Hill and Wang, New York, 1998); M.Z. Bookman, The Demographic Struggle for Power: The Political Economy of Demographic Engineering in the Modern World (Frank Cass, Portland and London, 1997); J. Parsons, Human Population Competition (2 Volumes), (Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York, 1998); F. Salter, "Estimating Ethnic Genetic Interests: Is It Adaptive to Resist Replacement Migration?" Population and Environment, vol.24, November 2002, pp.111-140.
19. B.A. Nelson, America Balkanized: Immigration's Challenge to Government, (American Immigration Control Foundation, Monterey, Virginia, 1994), p.32.
20. California Coalition for Immigration Reform, Reconquista! The Takeover of America (CCIR, Huntington Beach CA, 1997); J.P. Lubinskas, "We Have Been Warned," American Renaissance, June 1998, pp.7-8. Professor José Angel Gutierrez of the University of Texas said in 1995: "We have an aging White America. They are not making babies. They are dying. It's a matter of time."
21. See: R. Rodrigguez, "Mixed Blood: Columbus's Legacy: A World Made Mestizo," Harper's Magazine, November 1991, pp.47-56; J.E. Fallon, "Pushing Out Whitey," American Renaissance, vol.11, no.3. March 2000, pp.1, 3-7; S.A. McNallen, "Wotan vs Tezcatlipoca: The Spiritual War for California and the Southwest," The Runestone, no.22, Summer 1998, pp.3-6; G. Szamuely, "Mexican Merger?" The Social Contract, Fall 2000, pp.46-48; W. Lutton, "The Mexican Conquest of the Southwest," The Social Contract, Spring 2002, pp.229-231.
22. B.M. Cole, "City of Angels Evolving into a City of Contrasts," Los Angeles Business Journal, May 20, 1991, p.1.
23. D.G. McNeil Jnr., "Rare Infection Threatens to Spread in Blood Supply," New York Times November 17, 2003.
24. W. Cutton, "Immigration and Public Health," The Social Contract, Fall 2003, pp.12-20.
25. K. Patterson, "The Patient Predator: TB is Back Thanks to Globalization and Slipshod Treatment, Deadlier Than Ever," The Social Contract, Fall 2003, pp.21-28.
26. E. Niiler, "Diseased Passage," Scientific American, July 2000, pp.23-24. The rising tide of illegal and legal immigration into the U.S. now means the survival of the U.S. health care system: A. Green and J. Martin, "Uncontrolled Immigration and the U.S. Health care System," Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, vol.29, no.2, Summer 2004, pp.225-241.
27. Thomas W. Chittum, Civil War II: The Coming Breakup of America, (American Eagle Publications, Show Low AZ, 1996), p.1. Similar sentiments have been expressed by the environmentalist writer William Ophuls in Requiem for Modern Politics: The Tragedy of the Enlightenment and the Challenge of the New Millennium, (Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1997): "in short, because liberal democracy assumes near-universal allegiance to a common political culture, it is fundamentally incompatible with multiculturalism, to try to combine the two is to embark on a path whose logical terminus is civil war, followed by imperium." (pp.73-74). Professor Martin Van Creveld of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, also believes that the U.S. will break up: M. Van Creveld, The Transformation of War, (Free Press, New York, 1991), p.195. Yeh Ling-Ling, executive director of Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America has said: "The United States will face ethnic divides that exceed those in Kosovo and the Balkans. Quoted from P.C. Roberts, "The Mass Displacement of European Americans," The Social Contract, Summer 1999, pp.242-243.
28. The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Violence in America (New Century Foundation, Oakton VA, 1999): J. Taylor and G. Whitney, "Crime and Racial Profiling by U.S. Police: Is There an Empirical Basis?" The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, vol.24, no.2, Winter 1999, pp.485-510; R. Eisenman, "Characteristics of Prisoners in the California Department of Corrections: Race, Ethnicity and Other Aspects," The Mankind Quarterly, vol.61, no.2, Winter 2000, pp.211-215; A. Hama, "Demographic Change and Social Breakdown in U.S. Cities," The Mankind Quarterly, vol.40, no.1, 1999, pp.41-56; K. Lamb, "Crime Genes and Other Delusions," Chronicles, December 1996, pp.45-46; A. Moir and D. Jessel, A Mind to Crime, (Signet/Penguin, London, 1997); L. Taylor, Born to Crime: The Genetic Cause of Criminal Behaviour, (Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1984).
29. It is often argued by liberals that the proportional drop off in crime among Blacks in the 1990s indicates that criminality is mainly environmental rather than genetic. John Donohue and Steven Levitt from Stanford University Law School and the University of Chicago respectively, argue that the drop in crime rates in the 1990s may be due to the increase in abortions in the 1970s: a disproportionately high number of Black children among poor women who previously had unwanted children which fed crime, now could abort them. A generation of Black criminals were eliminated before being born. It is truly ironic that a cause such as abortion could have (unintended) eugenic spin-offs.
30. W. Pierce, "Black is Good; White is Bad," Free Speech, August 2000, pp.1-5.
31. W. Pierce, "Seattle's Fat Tuesday Riot," Free Speech, March 2001, pp.8-12. Along with this is the Black thing of raping White guys in prison, a "Black thing to do." Whites rarely rape Blacks in U.S. prisons. Whites, generally lacking gangs (apart from the Aryan Brotherhood) are often sold in prison as sexual slaves and made to wear "female clothing," made out of prison material: E. Kerling, "Racial Assaults in Prison," Instauration, December 1991, pp. 12-13.
32. R. Malan, "South Africa's Whites Fear They're Next," The Weekly Telegraph, April 26-May 2, 2000, p.24. South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki said in 2004 that the AIDS epidemic was a racist plot: "[Whites] accuse the black people of South Africa, Africa and the world, as being by virtue of our Africanness and skin color, lazy, liars, foul-smelling, diseased, corrupt, violent, amoral, sexually depraved, animalistic, savage and rapist."
33. G.B.N. Ayittey, Africa in Chaos, (St. Martin's Press, New York, 1998).
34. K.B. Richburg, Out of Africa: a Black Man Confronts Africa, (Basic Books, New York, 1997).
35. The U.S. backed Mandela's ANC terrorist "Spear of the Nation." He was advised by a cabal of Jews: Weinberg, Kodesh, Goldberg, Harmel, Berstein, Goldreich, Fischer Carneson, Strachan, Hodgson, Wolpe and Joe Slovo. Nelson Mandela made no secret of his revolutionary communist aims, publishing in January 1962 a booklet entitled How to be a Good Communist.
36. W. Pierce, "The Lesson of Amy Biehl," Free Speech, September 1998, pp.1-5.
37. The 18th century French colony of Saint-Domingue, now called Haiti, was once rich and prosperous. With the madness of the French Revolution and racial equality, the Blacks were encouraged to revolt. They murdered every White man, woman and child. The republic of Haiti was declared. It soon sank back into the filth and squalor that the land was before French colonization. The U.S. in 1915 and 1958 entered Haiti to prop it up, but each time it fell back into the law of the jungle. See L. Stoddard, The French Revolution in San Domingo, (Negro Universities Press, Westport, 1914).
38. N. Watson, "Gunfire of Rio's Mean Streets," New Internationalist, October 2003, p.7.
39. Consult the works of the historian David Irving on this point. Hitler had no intention of destroying Britain and even sent Hesse on a secret plane flight to Britain to negotiate peace. Hesse was imprisoned and State papers dealing with the issue were secured for 50 years, obviously to cover up this fact.
40. A. Browne, "U.K Whites Will be a Minority by 2100," London Observer, September 2, 2003; A. Browne, "Focus: Race and Population: The Last Days of a White World," Observer, September 3, 2000, p.17; B. Parekh, The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain: Report of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, (Profile Books, London, 2000).
41. A. Browne, "Guardian Unlimited," September 2000: http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/Documentaries/
42. A.H. Birch, Nationalism and National Integration, (Unwin Hyman, London, 1989), p.112.
43. As above.
44. There is no definite text dealing with all of these societies. On the role of Marxism in the war against the British people see F. Ellis, "Race, Marxism and the "Deconstruction" of the United Kingdom," The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, vol.26, no.4, Winter 2001, pp.691-718.
45. An old favorite from Belgium. A red-headed Belgium woman had been the mistress of an Indian lover. His sperm was so defective that it could not penetrate her eggs to create beautiful brown babies. In desperation she had his sperm sent to Belgium, where by the wonder of modern technology his defective sperm achieved … a moon landing. Eugenics, where are you?
46. See C. Stonehouse, "Voodoo Beliefs that Led to Ritual Murder," International Express, August 12, 2003, pp.21-22.
47. R. Honeyford, "Is There a Problem of Black Crime," The Salisbury Review, December 1995, pp.27-31.
48. L. McKinstry, "The Multicultural Thought Police," The Spectator, November 1, 2003, pp.16-17.
49. V. Suprynowicz, "Disarming Results," It's Time, no.77, 1999, p.5.
50. David Dale says that the Institute of Race Relation's hatred of England borders on "clinical paranoia!" D. Dale, "The New Ideology of Race," The Salisbury Review, October 1998, p.21.
51. P. Johnson, "How 'This Blessed Plot' was Left Off the European Map," The Weekly Telegraph, April 26, 2000.
52. See S. Francis, "The Vanishing Anglo-Saxon Minority," Chronicles, July 1999, pp.28-30. Hatred of the English is also found in some U.S. right wing groups such as La Rouche. For him the Queen of England pushes dope and Sir Isaac Newton did not make a "single useful contribution to scientific knowledge."
53. G. Bikales, "It Can't Happen Here, N'est-ce-pas?" Confronting the Forces of Dissolution," The Social Contract, Fall 1997, pp.64-67.
54. Richard McCulloch, "Save the Angels," Instauration, February 1990, pp.8-10. The same situation is occurring, most dramatically in the Asian invasion of Vancouver, Canada. "Vancouverites call the houses migrants buy "houses on death row," the houses immigrants build "monster houses,"… Asian immigrants love the large lots and good schools but not the old houses and beautiful gardens. As a result, terrible things are happening… When a house sells, a scorched-earth policy goes into effect. The house is razed, and with it every tree, shrub and blade of grass. In its place rises a structure so stupendous in size and alien in appearance that it might have dropped down overnight from Mars. … Through their monster houses the new neighbors seem to be saying: "We're different and separate and we are going to stay that way," Instauration, March 1990, p.31. Vancouver houses appear on Hong Kong computer screens the instant they are listed and are often bought unsighted. This is not multiculturalism - it is an invasion.
55. D. Barnett, "An Arab Government in Europe?" The Social Contract, Spring 2003, p.223. See also The Social Contract, Winter 2003-2004 on the dissolution of France.
56. P. Brimelow, Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster, (Random House, New York, 1995).
57. Above, pp.76-77.
58. Above, p.78. Ironically, Robert Kennedy was assassinated by an "Asian" immigrant Sirhan Sirhan.
59. C. Williamson Jr., The Immigration Mystique: America's False Conscience, (Basic Books, New York, 1996).
60. Above, p.62.
61. Above, p.63.
62. Above, p.66.
63. J.F. Kennedy, A Nation of Immigrants, (Harper and Row, New York, 1964).
64. Williamson Jr. cited note 59, p.67.
65. Above.
66. Above, p.73.
67. See W. Pierce, "Murdering Iowa," American Dissident Voices Broadcast of June 16, 2001: http://www.nation.com or http://www.natall.com.
68. Stephen Steinlight, "The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy," Center for Immigration Studies: http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/back130l.htm. See also Kevin MacDonald, "Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review," Population and Environment , vol.19, no.4, March 1998, pp.295-356.
69. Walter Block, "The Jews and Capitalism: A Love-Hate Enigma," The Journal of Social, Political Studies, vol.29, no.3, Fall 2004, pp.305-326, at 320-321.
70. C.H. Douglas, Social Credit, (Institute of Economic Democracy, Vancouver, 1979), p.29.
71. S. Francis, "The Real Cabal," Chronicles, September 2003.
72. P. Gottfried, After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999), p.76. Not all Germans are so virus-infected. Charlotte Hoehn, of the Federal Institute for Demography in Wiesbaden, 1994 German delegate to the World Population Conference in Cairo, dared to publicly state that she deplored the fact that researchers "no longer have the right to reveal that an African's average intelligence is less than that of other races." In an interview with Berliner Tageszeitung she also asked: "Is it desirable that people who are sick [genetically] should breed?" Predictably she was roasted by the press, although we do not know if she was prosecuted under Germany's multicultural race-hate laws.
73. G. Hardin, "Conspicuous Benevolence and the Population Bomb," Chronicles, vol.15, 1991, pp.20-22.
74. J. Tyndall, The Eleventh Hour: A Call for British Rebirth, (Albion Press, London, 1988).
75. M. Lind, Up From Conservatism: Why the Right is Wrong for America, (The Free Press, New York, 1996).
76. Above, p.84.
77. T.G. Mysrewicz, "Neo-Conservatives: Bolsheviks of Tomorrow?" Liberty Bell, vol.26, no.1, September 1998, pp.40-42.
78. An unthinking belief in the soundness of the American Constitution is another conservative fetish. Yet earlier thinkers such as Alexander Hamilton and Patrick Henry had a more critical mind. Hamilton referred to that sacred document as a "frail and worthless fabric". Henry said: "I look upon that paper as the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people!" See F. Donovan, Mr. Madison's Constitution, (Dodd and Mead, New York, 1965), pp.1-2.
79. T. Flemming, "White Like Me," Chronicles, November 1997, pp.10-12. All of this is hard to render consistent with T. Fleming's "Foreword," Chronicles, November 2001 on immigration. There he says that multiculturalism cannot be reversed and that America of the past is gone. There is a need to rebuild from the ruins.
80. e.g. J.E. Fallon, "The Politics of Hispanic Identity," Chronicles, November 1997, pp.37-40.
81. L. Auster, "The Immigration Path that Might Have Been," American Renaissance, November 1991, pp.4-6.
82. For a recent contribution to the Kosher race conservatism position see: G. McDaniel (ed.), A Race Against Time: Racial Heresies for the 21st Century, (New Century Books, Oakton, Virginia, 2003). E.J. Steele, Defensive Racism: An Unapologetic Examination of Racial Differences, (ProPer Press, Sagle, 2004), is a much superior book to the Standard American Renaissance position in the opinion of the present writers: and will be discussed elsewhere.