The Deep State (and Friends) in Action By Charles Taylor

     The US continues to deliver lessons to the world about how the Deep State acts, to neutralise even presidents it does not like. For example, top US officials are telling the world to ignore President Trump’s tweets: 

“Amid global anxiety about President Trump’s approach to world affairs, U.S. officials had a message for a gathering of Europe’s foreign policy elite this weekend: Pay no attention to the man tweeting behind the curtain.
U.S. lawmakers — both Democrats and Republicans — and top national security officials in the Trump administration offered the same advice publicly and privately, often clashing with Trump’s Twitter stream: The United States remains staunchly committed to its European allies, is furious with the Kremlin about election interference and isn’t contemplating a preemptive strike on North Korea to halt its nuclear program.

But Trump himself engaged in a running counterpoint to the message, taking aim on social media at his own national security adviser, H.R. McMaster, because he “forgot” on Saturday to tell the Munich Security Conference that the results of the 2016 election weren’t affected by Russian interference, a conclusion that is not supported by U.S. intelligence agencies. They say they will probably never be able to determine whether the Russian involvement swung the election toward Trump.”

     The Deep State is obsessed with creating war between the US and Russia, perhaps in the insane  belief that the US can win it, because they hate Putin’s nationalism, and see a war as a good ending to Trump. The fact that Obama interfered in elections, is not considered, nor do they follow through on the revelations about the financial motives of the Clintons and the Uranium One deal: 

“The FBI apparently ignored evidence of Russian involvement in the uranium market “when they approved the deal back in 2010,” said Peter Schweizer of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States’s (CFI) 2010 approval of the Russian government’s purchasing of a majority stake in Uranium One. Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute, offered his remarks in a Monday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with co-hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak. Robert Mueller — director of the FBI between 2001 and 2013 — must have known of corrupt dealings related to the Uranium One deal in 2010, said Schweizer. [Bruce Campbell] testified before Congress,” said Schweizer:

It was behind closed doors, so we don’t know the details, but essentially he was asked about what he knew as it related specifically to the Clinton Foundation, and what you hear indirectly — I was certainly not there — but what you hear indirectly is that he was told specifically by the Russians to work on helping get Uranium One approved. One of the things that they did was the Russians hired the lobbying firm APCO, and then APCO turned around and essentially gave an in-kind or free donation to the Clinton Foundation, valued somewhere in the order of $3 million.”

     The Uranium One corruption is an inconvenient truth for the system, and is ignored by the mainstream media, who cannot move beyond the appointed false news narrative that Putin stole the 2016 election away from Queen Hillary. How corrupt can a society get?



No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Saturday, 02 July 2022